LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

LGA review should show us warts and all

I am a huge supporter of the Local Government Association but it struggles to speak with one voice when it is criticising its own, writes Heather Jameson.

I am a huge supporter of the Local Government Association.

I absolutely believe that the local government world is a better place for having a single voice – and I am in favour of most of what it does.

As the Peer Review points out, if the LGA didn't exist, we would have to invent it.

The report does a great job of highlighting some of the best bits of the LGA and it claims the Graph of Doom, 100 days, and Rewiring Local Government reports showcase local government lobbying at its best.

However, the report is balanced – if somewhat politely.

It doesn't scrimp on highlighting the problems – some of which are inherent in the nature of the organisation.

It acknowledges that its diversity and consensus are its greatest strength and its greatest weakness.

On sector-led improvement, the Peer Review suggests the LGA needs to make reviews harder-hitting, intervene even where they are not wanted, and speak out against service failure.

The current consultation may provide some answers.

But as an association, reliant on subscriptions and consensus, the LGA struggles to speak with one voice when it is criticising its own and fails to bite the hands that feeds it.

The report is no doubt beautifully drafted to balance the criticisms with the praise – but they are there.

My understanding is that it was drafted several times in the six weeks between the initial findings and the final report – but I am told that was the LGA's opportunity to feed back.

What concerns me is the LGA comment on the report – which highlights the positives but fails to acknowledge any problems.

The review was initiated after Labour group leader Jim McMahon came into post last July – yet it was only conducted in January and only reporting now.

It smacks of a body dragging its heels.

For an organisation which peer reviews councils, and which is considering making reviews mandatory, I would have liked to have seen all the warts as the LGA showed local government just how Peer Reviews should be done.

But, as Cllr McMahon has suggested, what happens next will be the real test.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Spending Review 2025: Key takeaways for the sector

By Megan Tam | 13 June 2025

While local authorities have performed better in this Spending Review than expected, proposals to reform public service funding remain uncertain, say Tiffany...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Can reorganisation deliver its promises?

By Jason Lowther | 12 June 2025

As the latest round of reorganisation gets under way, Jason Lowther looks at what international research has to say about whether larger councils actually le...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Spending Review: A time for imagination and integration

By Katie Johnston | 12 June 2025

Reflecting on the Spending Review, Katie Johnson says a change of mindset is needed towards a more fundamental question: ‘what is actually working and delive...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Reorganisation cash will barely touch the sides

By Heather Jameson | 12 June 2025

Heather Jameson says ministers may end up making the final decisions on reorganisation ‘based on competing bids produced by costly consultants – with the Gov...

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson