Title

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

LGA review should show us warts and all

I am a huge supporter of the Local Government Association but it struggles to speak with one voice when it is criticising its own, writes Heather Jameson.

I am a huge supporter of the Local Government Association.

I absolutely believe that the local government world is a better place for having a single voice – and I am in favour of most of what it does.

As the Peer Review points out, if the LGA didn't exist, we would have to invent it.

The report does a great job of highlighting some of the best bits of the LGA and it claims the Graph of Doom, 100 days, and Rewiring Local Government reports showcase local government lobbying at its best.

However, the report is balanced – if somewhat politely.

It doesn't scrimp on highlighting the problems – some of which are inherent in the nature of the organisation.

It acknowledges that its diversity and consensus are its greatest strength and its greatest weakness.

On sector-led improvement, the Peer Review suggests the LGA needs to make reviews harder-hitting, intervene even where they are not wanted, and speak out against service failure.

The current consultation may provide some answers.

But as an association, reliant on subscriptions and consensus, the LGA struggles to speak with one voice when it is criticising its own and fails to bite the hands that feeds it.

The report is no doubt beautifully drafted to balance the criticisms with the praise – but they are there.

My understanding is that it was drafted several times in the six weeks between the initial findings and the final report – but I am told that was the LGA's opportunity to feed back.

What concerns me is the LGA comment on the report – which highlights the positives but fails to acknowledge any problems.

The review was initiated after Labour group leader Jim McMahon came into post last July – yet it was only conducted in January and only reporting now.

It smacks of a body dragging its heels.

For an organisation which peer reviews councils, and which is considering making reviews mandatory, I would have liked to have seen all the warts as the LGA showed local government just how Peer Reviews should be done.

But, as Cllr McMahon has suggested, what happens next will be the real test.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Progress on neighbourhood health, but much more to do

By Lee Peart | 04 June 2026

Greg Fell, president of the Association of Directors of Public Health (ADPH) and director of public health in Sheffield discusses how neighbourhood health ca...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Building trust, capacity and accountability in England's strategic authorities

By Sandy Forsyth | 04 June 2026

To address the complexities in the evolution of strategic authorities, devolution needs to work beyond the traditional metro mayoral model, says Sandy Forsyth.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

What England can learn from Japan's approach to local government finance

By Naoki Fujiwara | 04 June 2026

Consideration of Japan’s approach to local government funding suggests possibilities for doing things differently in England and opens up space to think abou...

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION

Governing through uncertainty – what happens next?

By Tim Farr | 04 June 2026

In an era of permanent uncertainty, Tim Farr assesses the challenges many local authorities, chief executives and senior leadership teams are now navigating ...

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson