Not a PUA choice

By Andrew Carter | 19 February 2015
  • Andrew Carter

All think tanks are subject to criticisms for their choice of datasets and classifications, and the conclusions they reach as a result of these decisions.  

At the Centre for Cities, it is our preference for using Primary Urban Areas (PUAs) to define cities that occasionally draws ire. In this vein, Paul Wheeler’s recent piece (‘It’s Not That Grim up North’) questioned the ongoing effectiveness of PUAs as a framework for understanding the changes that have taken place in UK cities, and particularly Manchester, over the past decade. 

Mr Wheeler claims that the landscape has changed so significantly since 2008, not least through the abolition of RDAs and the creation of combined authorities and LEPs, that the definitions that precede this time need to be amended. 

Want full article access?


Receive The MJ magazine each week and gain access to all the content on this website with a subscription.

Full website content includes additional, exclusive commentary and analysis on the issues affecting local government.

Already a subscriber? Login

Local economies Whitehall MHCLG Economic growth Core Cities Local Enterprise Partnerships Devolution Combined Authority
Top