Title

WHITEHALL

EXCLUSIVE: No-deal Brexit disruption warning

Local authorities have been warned to prepare for up to three months of disruption in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Local authorities have been warned to prepare for up to three months of disruption in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Organisations involved in local resilience forums (LRF) have been told to plan to have their multi-agency tactical co-ordination groups on stand-by to determine, co-ordinate and deliver the response if the UK crashes out of the EU without a deal in March.

LRFs have been informed they are likely to have to report to the Government every eight hours and holiday arrangements may have to be suspended over Easter, an indication of how seriously Whitehall is considering the risks.

Resilience forums have been asked to prepare for ‘reasonable, worst case scenarios' - which could include runs on banks, petrol and food – ‘without setting panic'.

A local government source said councils had done as much as possible with limited information from Whitehall.

The source said: ‘Councils are doing what they can with the limited information they are being given.

'We're feeling really nervous and really impatient.'

The codename Yellowhammer has been chosen to act as a shorthand for the 12 work streams across Government, with a local risk assessment to be carried out for each one.

All LRFs have been brought into the planning and preparation process after the Government released a raft of technical papers focusing on the impact of a no-deal Brexit.

Although the no-deal papers dealt with how ports and trading standards should adjust their processes when EU goods are treated as third party goods, they failed to consider the detail of delivery and capacity issues for councils.

A Local Government Association report read: ‘Councils are increasingly concerned about the possibility of a no-deal on Brexit, and are stepping up their work with businesses to ensure that they are as well prepared as possible and can make the necessary investments if needed.'

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) is expecting to have to rely on ‘internal reprioritisation' as a first resort to cover the costs of no-deal withdrawal but Downing Street has stressed that frontline spending will not have to be cut.

WHITEHALL

Community resilience, civil defence and the leadership challenge for councils

By Stephen Moir | 05 June 2026

Civil resilience cannot be left solely to emergency planners, says Stephen Moir. Local government leaders should consider how communities, services and partn...

WHITEHALL

What England can learn from Japan's approach to local government finance

By Naoki Fujiwara | 04 June 2026

Consideration of Japan’s approach to local government funding suggests possibilities for doing things differently in England and opens up space to think abou...

WHITEHALL

Governing through uncertainty – what happens next?

By Tim Farr | 04 June 2026

In an era of permanent uncertainty, Tim Farr assesses the challenges many local authorities, chief executives and senior leadership teams are now navigating ...

WHITEHALL

Keeping reorganisation on track: Preparing East and West Surrey for vesting day

By Terence Herbert | 03 June 2026

Ahead of the launch of East Surrey and West Surrey councils in April 2027, local government reorganisation is moving into a new phase with the implementation...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters