Title

WHITEHALL

EXCLUSIVE: No-deal Brexit disruption warning

Local authorities have been warned to prepare for up to three months of disruption in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Local authorities have been warned to prepare for up to three months of disruption in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

Organisations involved in local resilience forums (LRF) have been told to plan to have their multi-agency tactical co-ordination groups on stand-by to determine, co-ordinate and deliver the response if the UK crashes out of the EU without a deal in March.

LRFs have been informed they are likely to have to report to the Government every eight hours and holiday arrangements may have to be suspended over Easter, an indication of how seriously Whitehall is considering the risks.

Resilience forums have been asked to prepare for ‘reasonable, worst case scenarios' - which could include runs on banks, petrol and food – ‘without setting panic'.

A local government source said councils had done as much as possible with limited information from Whitehall.

The source said: ‘Councils are doing what they can with the limited information they are being given.

'We're feeling really nervous and really impatient.'

The codename Yellowhammer has been chosen to act as a shorthand for the 12 work streams across Government, with a local risk assessment to be carried out for each one.

All LRFs have been brought into the planning and preparation process after the Government released a raft of technical papers focusing on the impact of a no-deal Brexit.

Although the no-deal papers dealt with how ports and trading standards should adjust their processes when EU goods are treated as third party goods, they failed to consider the detail of delivery and capacity issues for councils.

A Local Government Association report read: ‘Councils are increasingly concerned about the possibility of a no-deal on Brexit, and are stepping up their work with businesses to ensure that they are as well prepared as possible and can make the necessary investments if needed.'

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) is expecting to have to rely on ‘internal reprioritisation' as a first resort to cover the costs of no-deal withdrawal but Downing Street has stressed that frontline spending will not have to be cut.

WHITEHALL

GDS Local: A digital transformation partnership for the future

By Ian Murray | 22 November 2025

For too long the Government Digital Service (GDS) hasn't played the role it should for local government, says minister for digital government Ian Murray. He ...

WHITEHALL

The National Housing Bank: Will it help councils build?

By Jack Shaw | 21 November 2025

The question of whether the National Housing Bank becomes a central plank of housebuilding and renewal or a missed opportunity will depend on the choices the...

WHITEHALL

Fair funding review labelled a 'sham'

By Martin Ford | 20 November 2025

The fair funding review has been labelled a ‘sham’ by rural councils following its publication today.

WHITEHALL

Covid Inquiry: Government 'failed to engage' with councils

By Martin Ford | 20 November 2025

The UK and devolved governments should have done more to engage with councils during the pandemic, the official Covid-19 Inquiry has found.

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters