Title

SOCIAL CARE

Paying the price for Government's mixed messages

In a 'killer blow' Jenrick has issued his caveat, says Heather Jameson. The Government will only pay for the ‘specific tasks’ it has handed down in relation to COVID-19. 'This is not just penny pinching, it is playing with people’s lives', she adds.

When historians judge the Government's response to the coronavirus crisis they will, quite rightly, focus on the human cost. The soaring death rates – with all the devastation, grief and loss that brings – will be examined.

The Government guidance, delays to lockdown and the farcical distribution of PPE will all be in the spotlight.

It is doubtful that local government finance will take centre stage in the history books but the latest missives from communities secretary Robert Jenrick are likely to have a devastating impact on the UK's people and economy for years – if not decades – to come.

Central government's mixed messages on local government funding have not just been chaotic, they have been catastrophic. Go back just a few weeks and the lines were clear. ‘Whatever it takes'.

Privately, ministers reassured: if you are close to financial collapse, come to us.

Local government was handed the responsibility to look after its communities – it is what the sector is there for. Now, in a killer blow, Mr Jenrick has issued his caveat. The Government will only pay for the ‘specific tasks' it has handed down.

That means no support for lost income. No funding for further pressures on services – from social care, to domestic abuse, to protecting those with lost income. No cash to support the local economy, rebuild town centres, create growth, jobs and skills. The list of costs – after a decade of cuts – is endless.

So surely this means a raft of s114 notices – councils declaring themselves to be out of cash. There may be threats, but here's the rub: a s114 is not just raising the flag on your finances, giving in on trying to balance the books; it is a freeze on spending.

To stop all but statutory spending in the midst of this crisis would be irresponsible – people would suffer. Until the immediate crisis has passed, local government is being held over a barrel, with central government holding the purse strings and calling the shots.

This is not just penny pinching, it is playing with people's lives – and it demonstrates a horrendous lack of trust in local government.

The Prime Minister has reassured the nation: austerity is over. But for local government, there is no money.

SOCIAL CARE

Unison's chief targets a fairer future for local government workers

By Heather Jameson | 05 November 2025

Unison leader Christina McAnea warns of worsening local government finances, inadequate pay and persistent equal pay injustices. She advocates for fair fundi...

SOCIAL CARE

Lessons from private and public sector leadership crossover

By Jes Ladva | 04 November 2025

Ensuring a leadership flow between the private and public sectors is one way to maximise the value of talent. Odgers recently held a round table with The MJ ...

SOCIAL CARE

Putting local government in the Budget driving seat: Leaning on the dream

By Mike Emmerich | 04 November 2025

Asked for his fantasy Budget, Mike Emmerich suggests we should ‘plan for the national big stuff’ and let local leaders innovate to fix the ‘knotty issues’.

SOCIAL CARE

Local government reorganisation: Better late than never

By Michael Burton | 04 November 2025

While LGR is already proving a challenge, for many Labour ministers it also represents unfinished business from five decades ago, says Michael Burton.

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson