Title

WHITEHALL

The importance of a wise intermediate layer

Little has been written during the pandemic about the missing role of intermediate layers of governance such as regional development agencies, says Abdool Kara. They might have prevented some of the response cul-de-sacs, he adds.

Much has been written through the COVID-19 pandemic about central-local relations, and in particular the centralising tendencies of government in the face of underutilised capabilities among local actors, best exemplified by the continuing test and trace ‘journey' from initial top down solutions, to more localised and blended arrangements.

Less has been written about the missing role of intermediary agencies, other than the ‘metro mayors', and in particular those agencies that largely no longer exist.

I have written previously about the sweeping away of such arrangements by the 2010-15 Government, and how their approach was driven by the desire to remove layers of governance, whether that was strategic health authorities and primary care trusts, regional development agencies, local education authorities such as they were, and even Whitehall's own Government Offices for the Regions.

In this context it is worth reflecting on the role such bodies might have carried out in preventing and mitigating the effects of the pandemic. Providing Government with more local, granular knowledge of places would have been invaluable. Equally, greater familiarity with local powers, duties, capabilities and capacities may have prevented some of the cul-de-sacs that COVID-19 responses have driven themselves down.

Feedback through the conduits that such sub-national arrangements engender would have helped with knowledge, relationships and negotiations, in a way that the current arrangements do not – clinical commissioning groups, local enterprise partnerships and regional schools commissioners are but pale shadows of what went before.

It is impossible to effectively manage a pandemic from the centre of even a relatively small country like the UK. Most would also baulk at the idea of a totally local approach. I would urge that whenever we can get around to designing the ‘to be', those designers spare a thought for the importance of a knowledgeable and wise intermediate layer that can mediate between the local and the national, that can cultivate successful relationships, and that can finesse the approaches of each to achieve the best possible outcomes, for local places and for the national interest.

Abdool Kara is executive leader for local services at the National Audit Office

WHITEHALL

EXCLUSIVE: Local government outcomes framework to be expanded

By EXCLUSIVE by Dan Peters | 11 December 2025

Whitehall plan to broaden outcomes framework revealed.

WHITEHALL

Tackling the debt tightrope

By Emily Whitford | 11 December 2025

Council tax arrears have continued to rise, says Emily Whitford. She argues that it’s time for a more modern system that delivers better outcomes and reduces...

WHITEHALL

Leadership capacity – the key to social care reform

By Nik Shah | 11 December 2025

Nik Shah reflects on a survey that finds confidence in social care reform is rising, but confidence in the leadership pipeline isn’t.

WHITEHALL

Delivering health and devo

By Louise Gittins | 10 December 2025

Cheshire and Merseyside are teaming up with local partners – and with Sir Michael Marmot and the Institute of Health Equity – to show how devolution can hard...

Abdool Kara

Popular articles by Abdool Kara