Title

WHITEHALL

The importance of a wise intermediate layer

Little has been written during the pandemic about the missing role of intermediate layers of governance such as regional development agencies, says Abdool Kara. They might have prevented some of the response cul-de-sacs, he adds.

Much has been written through the COVID-19 pandemic about central-local relations, and in particular the centralising tendencies of government in the face of underutilised capabilities among local actors, best exemplified by the continuing test and trace ‘journey' from initial top down solutions, to more localised and blended arrangements.

Less has been written about the missing role of intermediary agencies, other than the ‘metro mayors', and in particular those agencies that largely no longer exist.

I have written previously about the sweeping away of such arrangements by the 2010-15 Government, and how their approach was driven by the desire to remove layers of governance, whether that was strategic health authorities and primary care trusts, regional development agencies, local education authorities such as they were, and even Whitehall's own Government Offices for the Regions.

In this context it is worth reflecting on the role such bodies might have carried out in preventing and mitigating the effects of the pandemic. Providing Government with more local, granular knowledge of places would have been invaluable. Equally, greater familiarity with local powers, duties, capabilities and capacities may have prevented some of the cul-de-sacs that COVID-19 responses have driven themselves down.

Feedback through the conduits that such sub-national arrangements engender would have helped with knowledge, relationships and negotiations, in a way that the current arrangements do not – clinical commissioning groups, local enterprise partnerships and regional schools commissioners are but pale shadows of what went before.

It is impossible to effectively manage a pandemic from the centre of even a relatively small country like the UK. Most would also baulk at the idea of a totally local approach. I would urge that whenever we can get around to designing the ‘to be', those designers spare a thought for the importance of a knowledgeable and wise intermediate layer that can mediate between the local and the national, that can cultivate successful relationships, and that can finesse the approaches of each to achieve the best possible outcomes, for local places and for the national interest.

Abdool Kara is executive leader for local services at the National Audit Office

WHITEHALL

How we can sort out social care

By Lee Peart | 08 June 2026

Adult social care leaders gathered at The King’s Fund charity to discuss the prospects for finally addressing the fundamental issues facing the sector ahead ...

WHITEHALL

Developing strong local partnerships is critical if the Department of Education is to achieve its objectives

By Emma Willson | 08 June 2026

Effective partnerships, clear accountability and stronger evidence are essential if central and local government are to improve outcomes for children and del...

WHITEHALL

Government must invest in sector's capacity and agency

By Mo Baines | 08 June 2026

Mo Baines argues that councils’ crucial role as convenors of economic stakeholders and partnerships means the Government must reframe current policy and inve...

WHITEHALL

Community resilience, civil defence and the leadership challenge for councils

By Stephen Moir | 05 June 2026

Civil resilience cannot be left solely to emergency planners, says Stephen Moir. Local government leaders should consider how communities, services and partn...

Abdool Kara

Popular articles by Abdool Kara