DEVOLUTION

'A really terrible time' for reorganisation

There is never going to be a good time for local government reorganisation, says Paul Shevlin. 'There is definitely a really terrible time and this is it.'

At the beginning of July, when district councils were in the midst of supporting local businesses and residents through lockdown and into the ‘new normal', a bombshell was dropped in North Yorkshire.

Simon Clarke, the then minister of state for housing, communities and local government, told us that in order to unlock devolution in the region, local government reorganisation was a prior necessity. In other words, we wouldn't get the benefits of devolution unless we created unitary authorities within North Yorkshire and York. And we were likely to be asked to submit proposals by early September.

Since then, the seven district and borough council leaders have been working to develop the best possible model for local government reorganisation across these areas, while maintaining crucial services for residents and businesses and supporting them through the ongoing pandemic.

The leaders have pulled together and put us in a strong position. If we are asked to submit proposals for reorganisation we have a model that is better than any of the alternatives and the evidence to back that up. Now, the minister has resigned and been replaced; we haven't yet been asked to submit proposals. It's also unclear when exactly the devolution White Paper will be published. One can hope that the Government recognises what we have known all along: this is not the best time to put local government through upheaval.

We're trying to help our communities out of lockdown and recover from the COVID-19 pandemic while dealing with the spectre of local spikes, a second wave, and winter, not to mention Brexit. There is never going to be a good time for local government reorganisation. There is definitely a really terrible time and this is it.

We recognise that devolution is important for our region. Local councils, together with the Local Enterprise Partnership, have drawn up plans to improve crucial areas, including transport, town centres, housing, digital infrastructure, business growth, and low-carbon projects. But we shouldn't have to reorganise local government in order to unlock these benefits. District councils are at the heart of the COVID-19 response and recovery. Devolution shouldn't mean a dilution of localism and it should not be dependent upon reorganisation. That's not the way to achieve the Government's levelling-up agenda.

Paul Shevlin is chief executive of Craven DC. He writes in a personal capacity

DEVOLUTION

Designing a better framework for public scrutiny

By Tracy Bingham | 08 May 2025

For participation and oversight over council finances, we need to get behind Research for Action's call to make council budget and monitoring data widely ava...

DEVOLUTION

Filling in the holes in local democracy

By Mel Stevens | 08 May 2025

Mel Stevens considers where the new democratic deficits will lie in the new local government landscape.

DEVOLUTION

A shared definition of 'neighbourhoods' is important

By Jessica Studdert | 08 May 2025

Jessica Studdert says that for real impact at a hyperlocal level, neighbourhoods need to be considered 'as a core convening level for organising the services...

DEVOLUTION

Councils will bear the consequences of Reform's victory

By Heather Jameson | 08 May 2025

When it comes to local government reorganisation, 'the Labour Government could well be less gung-ho if it thinks it will be creating a sea of turquoise mayor...