Title

HUMAN RESOURCES

Breaking the strike law?

If the Conservatives gain an overall majority, the stage is set for a battle royal between Unite and employers if the union fails to get more than 50% turnouts when balloting for strike action, writes Paul McFarlane.

‘Unions must be able to fight for workers – even if it means breaking bad laws' Len McCluskey, Leader of Unite the Union – Guardian 19 March 2015.

Unite, the Union, has laid down the gauntlet to a future Conservative government. This follows recent proposals by the Conservative Party to place further limits on trade unions ability to call on their members to take part in lawful industrial action (see below). Unite has recently recommended that its rules be changed so that the words ‘…"so far as may be lawful" will no longer apply when its seeks to induce its members to take part in strike action.

Why has Unite taken this radical step? Currently, for a strike to be lawful, a union must ballot its members and gain a simple majority in favour from those who vote.  However, the Conservatives have put forward proposals which include insisting that 50% of union members vote in ballots that approve industrial action.

This proposal is seen by unions as undemocratic has many politicians (particularly local councillors, the Mayor of London etc.) are elected on turnouts which are much less than 50%. None of the other major political parties have indicated that they support this proposal.

If the Conservatives gain an overall majority, the stage is set for a battle royal between Unite and employers if Unite fails to get more than 50% turnouts when balloting for strike action.

In those circumstances, if Unite called its members out to strike an employer would be able to make an application for an injunction. Unite might try and resist such an application and argue that the new legislation breached the Human Rights Act (‘HRA').

However, Unite might be in difficulties because:

(a) the Conservatives have also pledged to abolish the HRA – so Unite would not be able to run a HRA argument; and

(b) even if the HRA was not abolished it is by no means certain that such argument would be successful. Recently in RMT v United Kingdom (2014) the European Court of Human Rights was not prepared to uphold  complaints made by the RMT that the requirements for pre strike notices and the law on ‘secondary action' [industrial action against an employer that is not a party to the trade dispute] were unlawful.

If the Conservatives are elected in power, Unite are likely to have an uphill battle in the courts challenging any further changes made to industrial relations law.

Paul McFarlane is a Partner in Weightmans LLP Employment & Pensions team


 

HUMAN RESOURCES

Urging for a fairer urban future

By Ann McGauran | 17 November 2025

Parliamentary chair of the Special Interest Group of Municipal Authorities (SIGOMA) Sally Jameson warns that changes in the fair funding reforms are set to s...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Shared power, shared Pride

By Helen Power | 17 November 2025

If the Government’s Pride in Place funding model can be operationalised in a way that kickstarts meaningful collaboration between communities and councils ‘t...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Blueprint for AI success

By James Arrowsmith | 14 November 2025

From efficiency to excellence: James Arrowsmith and Anja Beriro guide councils in how to leverage AI for impactful service delivery.

HUMAN RESOURCES

Reorganisation: MHCLG must come off the fence on staffing guidance

By Ian Miller | 13 November 2025

Ian Miller says the creation of unitaries means the Government must stop prevaricating, and update staffing guidance and regulations.

Paul McFarlane

Popular articles by Paul McFarlane