PLANNING

Councils clash over green belt housing

South Bucks DC has criticised its southern neighbours Slough Council for publishing proposals to build on green belt land within its boundary.

South Bucks DC has criticised its southern neighbours Slough Council for publishing proposals to build on green belt land within its boundary.

Slough published a draft report outlining plans to build a garden suburb in rural South Bucks, which the district council did not want published.

Paul Simpson, from Slough's planning department, said: ‘What we've done now is purely publish for information a draft report by our consultants - not endorsed by us - just showing how this development could take place so that we can have a proper grown-up discussion about it and begin to engage the landowners, as well as other interested parties.

‘We know it's in the green belt. We know we shall have to show very special circumstances. We'll do that at a later stage.'

Mr Simpson stressed that there was no room within Slough's urban area for more housing, particularly in light of the projected third Heathrow runway and other town centre developments.

But South Bucks' disappointed deputy leader, Cllr Nick Naylor, said: ‘This report has been published against our better advice.

‘It could totally mislead readers and give them an entirely incorrect impression that Slough Council has found a solution to its housing need shortfall in South Bucks. It has not.

‘There is no evidence to support Slough Council or Atkins' position while South Bucks DC has appropriately considered a northern extension option and has rejected it based on our own sound evidence and national planning policy.

‘We will, under the duty to co-operate, continue to work with Slough to help them find a solution to their housing needs where we can, but all evidence, to date, points to the fact a northern extension of Slough cannot be the answer.

‘That being the case, South Bucks members will continue to vigorously defend this strategic part of our green belt and protect this area from inappropriate development.'

PLANNING

Spending Review 2025: Key takeaways for the sector

By Megan Tam | 13 June 2025

While local authorities have performed better in this Spending Review than expected, proposals to reform public service funding remain uncertain, say Tiffany...

PLANNING

Can reorganisation deliver its promises?

By Jason Lowther | 12 June 2025

As the latest round of reorganisation gets under way, Jason Lowther looks at what international research has to say about whether larger councils actually le...

PLANNING

The blueprints for success of council companies

By Perry Holmes | 12 June 2025

Peter Ware and Perry Holmes look at how Medway Development Company and SCAPE are shaping the future of council companies.

PLANNING

Spending Review: The implications for economic development and growth

By Nigel Wilcock | 12 June 2025

The importance of economic development within the Spending Review to managing the delivery of programmes continues to show why the profession will need to be...

Popular articles by William Eichler