Title

FINANCE

Government must strengthen its oversight and assurance mechanisms

Readers of a certain age will vividly remember the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska. It was the second largest oil disaster in US history.

Readers of a certain age will vividly remember the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Prince William Sound, Alaska. It was the second largest oil disaster in US history.

Among the contributory factors was that the coastguard had stopped tracking ships leaving the Sound. The reason? There had never been an accident, so there was no need to continue this practice and savings could be made. With hindsight, ceasing the tracking was the epitome of a false economy.

The NAO is incredibly pleased at the positive reception to our recent report, Financial Sustainability of Local Authorities 2018. We set out to state definitively the funding position of local government and how that has changed in recent years. Moreover, while recognising that local authorities have generally coped well with cuts in their grants, we also wanted to shed light on the consequences of funding cuts for services. And for some services, such as waste collection and recycling, fly-tipping, food safety, bus services, and road maintenance, we were able to set out reductions in activities.

A lack of data prevented us going further: Figure 15 in the report sets out a number of services experiencing significant funding reductions of up to 67.5%, but for which there is no national service activity dataset.  So for many functions, including important environment and regulatory, housing and planning, highways and transport and cultural services, we cannot state the loss of facilities and services that have taken place, thus limiting Parliament's and the public's ability to hold government to account.

One of the first actions of the Coalition Government in 2010 was to dismantle the Best Value oversight regime. Even supporters of Best Value like myself would accept that some change was warranted by that point, but perhaps the baby was thrown out with the bathwater as the national indicator set was removed and authorities were left to their own benchmarking devices. As a result, if the department is to learn from the mistake of the Prince William Sound coastguard, it must continue to strengthen its oversight and assurance mechanisms if the local government ship is not to run aground.

Abdool Kara executive leader for local services at the National Audit Office (NAO)

FINANCE

How we delivered the Youth Investment Fund in Blackburn with Darwen

By Imran Akuji | 21 April 2026

Delivering the Youth Investment Fund in Blackburn with Darwen required a deliberate shift in the council’s role from lead applicant to system steward, says I...

FINANCE

Just like the weather, councils are rarely stable

By Blair McPherson | 20 April 2026

It is tempting to think the local government system is fundamentally stable, but this is seldom the case, says Blair McPherson. Leadership is learning to lea...

FINANCE

'One size fits all' rules for the Government when it comes to planning committees

By Ian Miller | 20 April 2026

Setting 13 as the maximum size of planning committees might suit district councils, says Ian Miller. ‘But it means planning will be the preserve of only a sm...

FINANCE

Fiscal devolution: A test of seriousness for government and places

By Mike Emmerich | 20 April 2026

If government and mayoral strategic authorities are willing to match fiscal responsibility and the retention of the proceeds of growth within agreed paramete...

Abdool Kara

Popular articles by Abdool Kara