Over the coming month, all eyes will be focussed on the local and European elections, and in particular, the potential rise of UKIP as a major political force a year out from the General Election.
But,  once the results are in, the next year of campaigning will start in  earnest. It's already clear it will be dominated by debates about  economic credibility, economic recovery and the extent to which people  feel they benefit from growth – a feeling that seems to vary depending  not only on who you are and the job you do, but also where you live.  
  
 Growth  is undeniably back:  in recent weeks, we have been bombarded by  positive statistics about the state of the national economy.
The Office for National Statistics, the Office for Budget Responsibility – even the International Monetary Fund – have all suggested that the good times have returned to the British economy, and that growth is here to stay. It's been a chance for the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats to argue that their ‘long term economic plan' is working, but that there is more they need to do.
Yet one of the most topical debates is whether, regardless of the  headline stats, people across the country feel that things are getting  better for them personally.
  
 Labour's Ed Milliband has gambled much political credibility that they  do not, as he continues to challenge the Government on standards of  living. Drawing on evidence from organisations like the Resolution  Foundation he insists that, despite growth returning to the economy,  sustained real terms increases in average wages are still some way off  and that the benefits of economic recovery are not being felt in all  parts of the country. 
  
 Although the overarching narrative of a "squeezed middle" has recently  been challenged by analysis from the Social Market Foundation, our  research suggests there is little doubt that the pace of recovery  continues to vary significantly between individual places. 
  
 For example, we know that, in large part the recovery has been led by  London. Between the start of the recession and the end of 2012, 4 out of  every 5 new private sector jobs were created in London, and there is  still insufficient evidence to judge whether this picture has radically  changed as the recovery has gathered pace. Just as before recession  struck in 2008, it seems likely that London is pulling away economically  from the rest of the economy.
  
 These trends are creating increased demand for infrastructure and  services within the Capital and across the Greater South East, where  house prices and transport costs continue to rise way in excess of  average wages. 
  
 For cities outside the capital,  there has been recent positive news on  jobs, and particularly on manufacturing (although the experience of  Germany suggests that manufacturing will struggle to create jobs at  scale). However, economic growth continues to be much slower than in  London, meaning that those living in places such as Sunderland,  Blackburn and Stoke, still face significant challenges in getting and  keeping well-paid work. 
  
 The different challenges facing different places have been recognised by  the Coalition who, through City Deals and other initiatives, have  worked to provide places with the powers and funding needed to tailor  national policies to in order to address local issues. But much more  remains to be done if cities outside London are to fulfil their  potential, and those living within them are to feel the benefits of the  growing economy.
  
 While the forthcoming local elections will be held up as a key milestone  on the campaign trail to the 2015 General Election, the real test for  each of the major parties will remain their economic credibility in the  eyes of the public. This is unlikely to be determined by national  statistics and headline figures alone, but also the day to day  experiences of voters as they access jobs, save to buy a home, or start a  family. 
  
 This means politicians must think about how they can best support people and empower places to grow in the years ahead.
My hope is that, as each party makes the case that they are best  placed to deliver the jobs, transport and housing that places need to  thrive, we will see a ‘race to the top' around cities policy and  devolution in particular, as a way for national politicians to directly  affect the day-to-day lives of people trying to make the most of the  opportunities that economic growth offers.
  
 Alexandra Jones is chief executive of Centre for Cities

