Title

WHITEHALL

Trio drop out of flagship fund

Three local authorities have now dropped out of the Government’s flagship Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF), it has emerged.

Three local authorities have now dropped out of the Government's flagship Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF), it has emerged.

Homes England, the Government's housing agency, confirmed that bids for Essex CC's Colchester Braintree Borders garden community, Suffolk CC's strategic highways works east of Ipswich and London's regeneration of Old Oak have all been withdrawn.

The councils walked away from receiving ‘forward funding,' which had been due to be targeted at large, strategic and high-impact infrastructure projects aimed to ‘unlock' new homes in the medium and longer-term.

Two other successful bids – £29.4m for Rutland CC's St George's Barracks garden village and £14.7m for Leicestershire CC's Melton Mowbray southern distributor road - have yet to finalise contracts almost four years after the fund was first announced.

One reason for projects failing to get across the line – cited by some Rutland councillors - could be the wide-ranging pre-contract conditions imposed by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) – such as for funding to have been drawn down by the end of 2024.

This led Rutland to reject the cash, with one councillor warning the council would be financially liable and ‘risked bankruptcy' if the scheme could not be completed by the deadline.

An evaluation scoping report for the Government, published last month, warned: ‘If local authorities are not able to complete these pre-funding activities there would be a risk that funding will never be made available.'

Shadow minister for housing and planning, Mike Amesbury, said: ‘Like so many of this government's housing promises, the HIF is shaping up to be a promise the Tories couldn't deliver.

'The £5bn HIF is the latest poorly-designed policy, which is now unravelling.'

In an essay collection for think-tank Localis last year, chairman of the Local Government Association's housing board, Cllr David Renard, called on the Government to ‘expedite payment of outstanding HIF allocations, relax conditions so that councils can focus on delivery, and extend deadlines and flexibilities on completion timescales'.

MHCLG has described the HIF, which originally awarded funding to 34 local authorities, as an ‘integral part of measures to facilitate increased housing supply'.

WHITEHALL

Using below-market land disposals to accelerate social housing

By Mark Cook | 09 June 2026

Councils have greater flexibility to dispose of land for affordable housing than often assumed, but outdated consent rules should be reformed to support deli...

WHITEHALL

How we can sort out social care

By Lee Peart | 08 June 2026

Adult social care leaders gathered at The King’s Fund charity to discuss the prospects for finally addressing the fundamental issues facing the sector ahead ...

WHITEHALL

A rights-based case for new homes at Crews Hill and Chase Park

By Holly Lewis | 08 June 2026

Holly Lewis says a rights-based approach to planning can help councils balance local concerns with housing need, ensuring decisions reflect the interests of ...

WHITEHALL

Government must invest in sector's capacity and agency

By Mo Baines | 08 June 2026

Mo Baines argues that councils’ crucial role as convenors of economic stakeholders and partnerships means the Government must reframe current policy and inve...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters