Title

FINANCE

Two birds one stone on audit

The recommendation in the Redmond review to push back the accounts completion and audit dates is, in the view of Simone HInes, a backward step, 'a point the Society of District Council Treasurers made during the review process'.

There's no doubt the Redmond review is a thorough and in-depth study and pinpoints what we have known for some time – that the current audit system isn't working and needs to change. I still can't help feeling a little underwhelmed.

The recommendation to push back the accounts completion and audit dates is, in my view, a backward step, a point the Society of District Council Treasurers made during the review process.

Yes, the current timetable is ambitious and puts pressure on finance teams (especially for small finance teams in districts) but it means we can put them to bed early and crack on with more meaningful things – mainly the budget-setting process and vital projects such as town centre and housing schemes.

In districts it's the same key people closing the accounts who are also responsible for getting the budget-setting process under way in the summer, so dragging the accounts and audit process out until September is an unwanted distraction.

The real wasted opportunity from the review is streamlining of the accounts. The review found an almost unanimous view that the current statement of accounts are unfathomable to most readers, yet the only recommendation is to add another statement.

I partly understand the rationale behind this addition in helping readers interpret the difference between the complex statutory accounts and the actual financial position of the council, but adding a further statement is the wrong answer. It is even more work for finance teams and the need for the statement itself is further evidence that the current accounts are not fit for purpose.

Instead, a fundamental review of financial reporting in local government and what stakeholders are really interested in should be done. If we cracked this conundrum it might reduce the time needed to audit the accounts, so other issues around the timetable and fees may not be such a problem. Two birds, one stone.

Simone Hines is president of the Society of District Treasurers and executive director of resources at Nuneaton and Bedworth BC

FINANCE

Calls for fair funding tax flexibility

By Martin Ford | 22 August 2025

The Government has been urged to lift the council tax referendum limit to help local authorities hit by the fair funding review.

FINANCE

Fair funding must reflect real need – not just population growth

By Cllr Tracey Dixon | 21 August 2025

Any fair funding formula must reflect not just how many people live in an area, but the depth and breadth of their needs, says the leader of South Tyneside C...

FINANCE

Back on track for families

By Jeanette Richards | 18 August 2025

When Jeanette Richards took up her executive director of children’s services’ post at Bury Council, her department had just been rated inadequate. Ofsted has...

FINANCE

Fix the flawed children's funding formula

By Michael McVicker | 15 August 2025

Michael McVicker explains why the proposed children’s social care funding formula is unfit for purpose.

Popular articles by Simone Hines