Title

WHITEHALL

Capping the pace of change

While one part of central government is local for reorganisation and modernisation, the other cuts exit payments and blocks a major way to drive the pace of change, says Graeme McDonald.

Public administration at a local level has many advantages. The most powerful is the ability to join services and policy together in a way that fully surrounds an issue, magnifying impact.

Replicating this as your geographical footprint increases becomes more difficult – local insight becomes cloudier, organisational and professional boundaries less permeable and decision-making slower, and the implications of failure more significant. This is the core argument for subsidiarity, the importance of local government generally, and specifically, the need for greater devolution in the UK.

It is why the EU was unresponsive to the challenges experienced by many communities across the UK (and elsewhere), and why the concerns of the ‘red wall' cannot be addressed from Westminster. Not only because of the physical remoteness of Brussels or Whitehall, but because scale is a barrier to different organisations, professionals and politicians working effectively together.

Whitehall, despite many civil servants recognising and working to change this, is not always able to work well across departments. The result is ‘the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing'.

We see this with local government ministers promoting structural change and reorganisation across swathes of the country, while at the same time the Cabinet Office is introducing a £95,000 cap on public servants' exit payments, creating a barrier to the transformation Marsham Street seeks to promote.

Exit payments are a vital tool to create incentives for employees to leave during a period of change and reorganisation. Capping these will undermine that incentive for large numbers of employees, including frontline team leaders as well as those in more senior positions.

The cap will slow already difficult change – the UK has been unitarising counties since Local Government Act 1992 – it also risks hollowing out a fragile pipeline of future leadership. If long-serving employees lack the incentive to leave early, reorganisation will push out those who are our future.

Exit payments will remain controversial, but it should be for publicly accountable local employers to decide their fairness and to judge the impact on the organisation's ability to change at the pace required.

Graeme McDonald is managing director of The Society of Local Government Chief Executives (Solace) and Solace in Business

WHITEHALL

Growing towards health

By Sharlene McGee | 31 July 2025

New devolution powers and local growth plans should lay the ground for health in all policies, not just some, says Sharlene McGee.

WHITEHALL

The Vale's bright future

By Rob Thomas | 31 July 2025

Vale of Glamorgan Council’s new strategic plan offers a destination and a transformational route map to take it through to the end of the decade. Rob Thomas ...

WHITEHALL

Knitting places together again

By Professor Donna Hall | 31 July 2025

The place-based approach is ready for the mainstream – so it’s important that the system around it is too, say Dr Simon Kaye, Andrew Laird and Professor Donn...

WHITEHALL

Partnering in Essex to promote a greener future

By George Frost | 31 July 2025

George Frost looks at how group community energy schemes are pioneering sustainable solutions in Essex.

Graeme McDonald

Popular articles by Graeme McDonald