Title

HOUSING

Common themes from the regulatory judgements

Themes are emerging from the Regulator of Social Housing's recent judgements from which councils can learn, writes Catherine Little.

© Clare Louise Jackson/Shutterstock

© Clare Louise Jackson/Shutterstock

Three local authorities have now received a C1 regulatory judgement: the top possible grade for social landlords from the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH).

The narrative in the regulatory judgements for Barnsley MBC (which has an ALMO, Berneslai), West Lancashire BC and the City of Westminster Council have some common themes:

  • All three councils provided evidence and independent assurance of understanding their homes and of meeting landlord health and safety requirements.
  • Tenant safety is central to the RSH's approach. They expect evidence that the right safety checks and risk assessments are done correctly and that any necessary fixes are made promptly.

It is clear there had been preparations and senior level engagement at each of the councils, with one part way through delivering an improvement plan. A C1 grading denotes that the landlord broadly meets the outcomes of the standards. There is a theme across the C1 providers – council and housing association – of self-awareness and of having realistic plans in place, with a track record of delivery.

A culture of treating tenants with fairness and respect is a strength for two of the councils, in complaints handling, engagement and interactions with tenants.

The RSH does not have the remit to give a governance grading to local authorities. It is clear from the C1 judgements to date, however, that good governance is central to demonstrating compliance with the regulatory standards. This means clear and robust oversight across landlord services is critical, along with an understanding of risk and assurance. Controls such as policies should be well designed and operating in practice, and the data underpinning performance reporting, property and tenant insight must be correct.

Campbell Tickell is exploring these themes through a governance survey for councils with retained housing stock, being distributed by the Association of Retained Council Housing (ARCH) and through a free seminar to be held on Thursday 24 April.

 

Catherine Little is a director at Campbell Tickell

HOUSING

Building digital foundations for social housing

By Lord Chris Holmes | 10 July 2026

Lord Chris Holmes looks at how AI and digital infrastructure can help social housing deliver safer, fairer and more efficient services.

HOUSING

Local government reorganisation: What councils must get right

By Elliott Fletcher | 23 June 2026

Most LGR savings assumptions won't deliver without this – what every council must get right before day one.

HOUSING

Lessons from Swansea: A collaborative approach to addressing poverty stigma

By Amanda Hill-Dixon | 11 June 2026

Amanda Hill-Dixon sets out evidence-informed actions for councils to reduce poverty stigma through universal services, dignified support, inclusive communica...

HOUSING

What England can learn from Japan's approach to local government finance

By Naoki Fujiwara | 04 June 2026

Consideration of Japan’s approach to local government funding suggests possibilities for doing things differently in England and opens up space to think abou...

Popular articles by Catherine Little