Title

HOUSING

Common themes from the regulatory judgements

Themes are emerging from the Regulator of Social Housing's recent judgements from which councils can learn, writes Catherine Little.

© Clare Louise Jackson/Shutterstock

© Clare Louise Jackson/Shutterstock

Three local authorities have now received a C1 regulatory judgement: the top possible grade for social landlords from the Regulator of Social Housing (RSH).

The narrative in the regulatory judgements for Barnsley MBC (which has an ALMO, Berneslai), West Lancashire BC and the City of Westminster Council have some common themes:

  • All three councils provided evidence and independent assurance of understanding their homes and of meeting landlord health and safety requirements.
  • Tenant safety is central to the RSH's approach. They expect evidence that the right safety checks and risk assessments are done correctly and that any necessary fixes are made promptly.

It is clear there had been preparations and senior level engagement at each of the councils, with one part way through delivering an improvement plan. A C1 grading denotes that the landlord broadly meets the outcomes of the standards. There is a theme across the C1 providers – council and housing association – of self-awareness and of having realistic plans in place, with a track record of delivery.

A culture of treating tenants with fairness and respect is a strength for two of the councils, in complaints handling, engagement and interactions with tenants.

The RSH does not have the remit to give a governance grading to local authorities. It is clear from the C1 judgements to date, however, that good governance is central to demonstrating compliance with the regulatory standards. This means clear and robust oversight across landlord services is critical, along with an understanding of risk and assurance. Controls such as policies should be well designed and operating in practice, and the data underpinning performance reporting, property and tenant insight must be correct.

Campbell Tickell is exploring these themes through a governance survey for councils with retained housing stock, being distributed by the Association of Retained Council Housing (ARCH) and through a free seminar to be held on Thursday 24 April.

 

Catherine Little is a director at Campbell Tickell

HOUSING

Using the 'evidence pie' for better local government decision-making

By Amy Lloyd | 21 May 2026

The Evidence Pie provides a clear and adaptable model to help embed evidence-informed decision-making as a shared responsibility across Rhondda Cynon Taf CBC...

HOUSING

Home Truths: Linking data for healthier homes

By Tom Prendergast | 15 May 2026

Tom Prendergast says improving the UK’s housing cannot wait, and streamlining data linkage enables us to efficiently identify inequalities, evaluate housing ...

HOUSING

Regeneration: The next decade of local energy leadership

By Andrew Spencer | 13 May 2026

Warm, efficient homes are no longer a niche housing or fuel poverty issue; they are becoming a defining place based mission for UK local leadership. The gove...

HOUSING

Regeneration: Liberating nature-based infrastructure

By Stephen O'Malley | 13 May 2026

Local authorities lack the funding and co-ordination to respond effectively to climate risks like heat and flooding. Nature-based solutions work, yet large-s...

Popular articles by Catherine Little