Title

PLANNING

Airport expansion 'flies in face' of democracy

The leader of North Somerset Council has expressed his ‘extreme disappointment’ at a decision to allow the expansion of Bristol Airport.

North Somerset Council's leader has expressed his ‘extreme disappointment' at a decision to allow the expansion of Bristol Airport.

The independent Planning Inspectorate yesterday announced it will allow Bristol Airport's capacity to increase from 10 million passengers a year to 12 million despite North Somerset Council's rejection of the plans.

Bristol Airport welcomed the decision, arguing it will lead to the creation of 800 jobs and up to a further 5,000 regionally.

However, North Somerset Council leader, Cllr Don Davies, said the decision ‘disregards the views of the local communities.'

He said: ‘Having heard all the evidence and listened to both professional advice and the views of local residents, our planning committee voted to refuse the application to expand the airport's capacity beyond an as-yet-unreached 10 million passengers a year, being barely eight million pre-pandemic.

‘The refusal was based on sound planning grounds and the firm belief that the detrimental effect of the expansion of the airport on this area and the wider impact on the environment outweighed the narrower benefits of airport expansion, which sit almost entirely in the commercial interests of the owners, a foreign pension fund.

‘At the inquiry our team of specialist consultants, led by a senior QC, mounted a robust defence of the council's position and it is extremely disappointing that the inspectors have overturned our decision and given the go-ahead for Bristol Airport to grow even further with all the associated noise, environmental and health impacts that entails.

‘This simply flies in the face of local democracy and disregards the views of the local communities who fought equally hard to resist the expansion.

‘It completely undermines our vision for a greener north Somerset, our determination to tackle the climate emergency and the target we have set for the area to be carbon neutral by 2030.'

PLANNING

Regeneration: Tenacity, not tenure: keeping a long-term project on track

By Nick Eveleigh | 23 December 2025

Delivering a new train station in Chelmsford has been a decades-long project. Nick Eveleigh reflects on the long-term nature of delivering what really matter...

PLANNING

Who is responsible for regeneration?

By Jack Shaw | 16 December 2025

The regeneration landscape is ill-defined and fragmented, says Jack Shaw. Is there a need to clarify the role of local authorities in delivering projects?

PLANNING

Regeneration: Unpicking the new mayoral fund

By David Blackman | 16 December 2025

The Budget may not have pulled any rabbits out of the hat for growth and regeneration, but there were details on how the Mayoral Revolving Growth Fund will w...

PLANNING

APSE's annual polling generates good and bad news for councils

By Mo Baines | 11 December 2025

Highlights from APSE’s major annual Survation poll has found a divergence of views amongst the public and councillors on asylum accommodation and unwelcome ...

Popular articles by William Eichler