Title

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Local government does a brilliant job in elections

Ben Page 'cannot ever recall a UK election 'like the one Americans are currently fighting over'. He says it is 'sometimes worth remembering just how efficient and effective British local government is'.

After a few days of watching the American elections, I am starting to feel rather patriotic, partly because the UK polls performed much better than the American ones in both May and December last year; Ipsos MORI's average error for each party in December was only 0.3%. The Brits therefore may have learned their lessons from 2016, whereas Americans seem to be repeating them. But I am proudest of the brilliant job local government does in British elections.

Our system just seems to work. Although we count elections locally, they are all run on the same countrywide basis. So, no local variation on voter registration, on who's eligible for a postal vote, or when postal votes are counted, or on verification for postal voting, or on how results are announced. In contrast, the variation in the US system has been very confusing and clearly damaged the credibility of US democracy (helped too by Trump's antics of course).

We know that state-controlled laws on voter registration have been used as vote suppressants in outrageous way – with all sorts of tests designed to trip up poor black voters. The fact that elected state officials, who stand on party slates, oversee elections in the US provides plenty of opportunity to those who want to cause mischief. In contrast, in the UK, elections are overseen by independent local authority officials who are consistently excellent. While issuing running vote tallies as votes get counted provides transparency, they allow some to erroneously argue that fraud is taking place. In contrast, given the result is only announced once in the UK, after all the votes have been counted, I cannot ever recall an election like the one Americans are currently fighting over.

It made me think that the electoral count teams of Sunderland and Newcastle, who vie to produce the fastest count in the UK, should get on a plane and go and help out. Their commonsense approaches – like using bank tellers to help with the count – might make all the difference.

While we look at America's divisions, and see our own reflected back, it is sometimes worth remembering just how efficient and effective British local government is, and also, just to cheer us up, that our politics remain far less divided than the Americans'.

Ben Page is chief executive of Ipsos MORI

@benatipsosmori

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Hard truths facing the NHS

By Matthew Taylor | 21 July 2026

As Andy Burnham arrives at No10, Matthew Taylor argues that real NHS transformation demands upfront investment, a twin-track approach that moves faster where...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Why energy transition is bottom up

By Julian Leslie | 21 July 2026

Julian Leslie reflects on a visit to Teesside explains why regional insight, not top-down planning, will determine whether the clean energy transition delive...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

The problem with housing: Viability

By Heather Jameson | 17 July 2026

Uncertainty, viability and devolution: local authorities face a collection of hurdles and opportunities when it comes to delivering much-needed housing. The ...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Expanded cities the winners in reorganisation plans

By Paul Marinko | 16 July 2026

The Government has backed expanded city authorities across the country with its announcement on local government reorganisation for remaining two tier areas.

Ben Page

Popular articles by Ben Page