Title

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Virtual meeting challenge dismissed by High Court

Councils will not be able to continue to meet virtually after 6 May after High Court judges dismissed a legal challenge by local government.

Councils will not be able to continue to meet virtually after 6 May after High Court judges dismissed a legal challenge by local government.

The Association of Democratic Services Officers (ADSO), Lawyers in Local Government (LLG) and Hertfordshire CC launched a judicial review after the Government refused to extend emergency legislation to allow virtual meetings beyond the 6 May deadline.

In a hearing last week, they argued councils could use existing powers to meet remotely. It would remove the need for primary legislation, which the Government claims is not possible.

However, judges have now ruled a ‘physical presence' is needed for remote meetings under existing legislation. They claimed: ‘The decision whether to permit some or all local authority meetings to be conducted remotely… involves difficult policy choices on which there is likely to be a range of competing views.'

Those decision, they concluded, ‘are for Parliament, not the courts'.

ADSO chair, John Austin, said he was ‘extremely disappointed' with the judgement. The situation Councils now find themselves in is untenable and I call on the Secretary of State to back up his support for our claim and legislate quickly, as Governments have in Wales and Scotland,' he said.

President of LLG, Quentin Baker, added: ‘I'm confident that we have paved the way for Government to legislate and LLG will be working closely with ADSO to assist the secretary of state to deliver that outcome.'

Local Government Association chairman, Cllr James Jamieson, also voiced his disappointment. ‘Councils by law, have to hold annual meetings within 21 days following local elections, so many will now have to use very large external venues to allow all members of the council to meet in person,' he said.

Even communities secretary Robert Jenrick has publicly announced he is in favour of virtual meetings, despite the Government's claim there is no room for primary legislation.

Following the announcement, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'We are grateful for the efforts of councils to ensure meetings could continue remotely over the past year.

'Councils will need to return to face-to-face meetings after 6 May and should continue to prepare accordingly.' 

LLG and ADSO have vowed to continue to lobby for legislation to be brought forward quickly to amend the rules and allow councils to meet virtually.

There is currently a government consultation on the issue underway.

Jackie Weaver makes the case for virtual meetings

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Trashing the new burdens local government funding doctrine

By Ian Miller | 03 February 2026

There seems no proof yet that a penny has been added to the local government settlement to meet the ‘massive’ new burden of meeting the statutory duty for we...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Seeing the big picture

By Ann McGauran | 03 February 2026

Will delays to some of this year’s local elections help councils focus on forming new unitaries and ultimately smooth the path to devolution? Ann McGauran sp...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

London needs fewer councils as part of a broader governance reset in the capital

By Cory Berman | 02 February 2026

Cutting the number of boroughs in London would enable the creation of the governance system the capital has been crying out for, say Dr Simon Kaye and Cory B...

LOCAL DEMOCRACY

Political convenience is no justification for unconstitutional local election tinkering

By Colin Copus | 02 February 2026

The Government’s decision to ‘postpone or cancel’ local elections is ‘a travesty of constitutional propriety’ say emeritus professors Steve Leach and Colin C...

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson