Title

ADULT SOCIAL CARE

We need an entirely new approach on care

increased technological advances mean that in the future care is far more likely to be provided in people’s homes, says Jonathan Rallings. He argues that we need to create a system which can evolve to meet these more sophisticated needs.

The tragic circumstances we have seen in care homes during coronavirus have again exposed the fragility of the system. Of course, voices in local government have been shouting for a long time about the financial crisis facing social care arising from the dents made in a can that has now been kicked down the road so many times it is withered and misshapen.

While policymakers have woken up to the challenges facing social care, they seem obsessed with one small part of the issue. Some of the ideas being talked up – particularly those postulating a centralised ‘National Care Service' – have a narrow view of social care consisting primarily of ensuring the supply of care homes and supporting discharges from healthcare.

There is still a tendency to see social care through the prism of what the health service needs – but the system is far broader. Every day, councils provide care for a range of adults – including those with chronic conditions, mental health impairments, or substance addiction.

For the system to become truly effective it also needs to look at how it is properly integrated with other services – not only health, but housing; children's services; even economic growth. This can only be done effectively if it is run locally.

Perhaps real reform might come from reimagining the present divide between ‘health' and ‘care' and instead use the pandemic as a springboard to a new integrated system which is split between ‘acute' and ‘community' services.

Yes, sometimes care needs to be in institutions, but increased technological advances mean that in the future it is far more likely to be provided in people's homes. We need to create a system which can evolve to meet these more sophisticated needs – a good start might be to examine how we can incentivise more ‘retirement communities', which is persuasively argued in a recent report.

The pandemic has shone a spotlight on social care and the urgent need for reform and as the country looks towards ‘recovery' it needs to be a key aspect of what we do differently. Government needs to not only resist kicking the present can down the road any further but instead to boot its dented frame into touch for good. Post-COVID, we need an entirely new can.

Jonathan Rallings is senior policy officer for social care at the County Councils' Network

ADULT SOCIAL CARE

Councils must be empowered to set all fees and charges

By Ian Miller | 02 April 2026

Ian Miller says it’s time to end the centralism where fees and charges 'are set by Whitehall, don’t take account of councils’ costs and are infrequently upda...

ADULT SOCIAL CARE

Toil, then trouble on LGR

By Martin Ford | 02 April 2026

The Government has announced its decisions on new unitaries in four of the Devolution Priority Programme areas. But Essex CC is threatening legal action, cou...

ADULT SOCIAL CARE

LGR and the ominous signs for cross-council working

By Paul Marinko | 02 April 2026

Whether or not counties decide to legally challenge proposals, they are likely now to engage less with the process, writes Paul Marinko.

ADULT SOCIAL CARE

Closing the collaboration gap

By Victor Adebowale | 02 April 2026

Victor Adebowale looks at how to move from rhetoric to reality and make collaboration between local government and health possible.

Popular articles by Jonathan Rallings