WHITEHALL

Extra funding eases the pain for councils

Whether MPs really would have voted the finance settlement down, we will never know, says James Maker. But the letter from 46 MPs 'was undoubtedly the tipping point in the negotiations'.

Just a couple weeks ago, there was the very real prospect that the local government finance settlement could have failed to pass a parliamentary vote in the House of Commons this week.

This could have plunged councils and Whitehall into uncharted territory, but that scenario has been averted as a result of the £600m recently announced by government.

But we should not underestimate how important the risk that MPs could have blocked the settlement was in securing this 11th hour investment.

Over the last three months, the County Councils' Network (CCN) and Local Government Association (LGA) laid out the evidence on the dire financial state facing councils.

Thanks to the sector's efforts, and in particular talks between the CCN chairman, the chancellor and the levelling-up secretary, we convinced them both of the clear need to intervene.

But No10 needed something extra to focus their mind. The last roll of the dice was lobbying MPs ahead of the vote on the settlement.

If you had told me before Christmas CCN would secure 46 signatures (44 from the governing party) to the County All Party Parliamentary Group letter I would have said you were mad – our target was 28, but I was sceptical we would even make achieve this.

Years of experience in national lobbying has taught me that (most) MPs rarely show interest in local government beyond their postbag (unless it's planning reform). This time, we had robust evidence to support our cause and a parliamentarian (and county leader) in Cllr Ben Bradley who went the extra mile in securing signatures to our letter. This built on a targeted and focused campaign, supported brilliantly by CCN leaders engaging their local MPs.

Whether MPs really would have voted the settlement down, we will never know. But the letter was undoubtedly the tipping point in the negotiations.

Of course, the funding secured is in no way a silver bullet, it eases the pain for councils; it does not eradicate it. Service reductions and council tax rises of 5% are still required. But as I said to many people after the announcement, ‘that's £600m the sector didn't have yesterday'.

James Maker is director of policy and communications at the CCN

X - @CCNOffice

WHITEHALL

Fair funding finally within sight

By Sir Stephen Houghton | 11 July 2025

Full council tax equalisation will have a huge impact for the most deprived areas, but for the sector to be able to work with Government as a partner an incr...

WHITEHALL

WLGA defends councils over Covid funds

By Martin Ford | 10 July 2025

The Welsh Local Government Association (WLGA) has defended the role of councils in distributing social care funding during the Covid pandemic.

WHITEHALL

LGA calls for EHCP scale back amid potential backlash

By Emily Twinch | 10 July 2025

Local authorities have called for the scaling back of Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs) despite a backlash as the Government looks to reform the regime.

WHITEHALL

Devo Bill to reintroduce supplementary vote in blow to Reform

By Dan Peters | 10 July 2025

The supplementary vote system will be reintroduced to elect mayors in a move that is expected to reduce the chances of success for Reform UK.

James Maker

Popular articles by James Maker