FINANCE

The false divide has become a false economy

Jessica Studdert says: 'The Spending Review is an opportunity to shift spending towards long-term, mission-aligned objectives even within a tough fiscal climate, but the Government needs to end the false divide between protected and unprotected departments.'

Jessica Studdert © New Local

Jessica Studdert © New Local

The false divide between ‘protected' and ‘unprotected' departments is becoming a false economy.

In Whitehall, silos are easy to uphold. They literally exist in different buildings – health, education, local government, work and pensions. Each has separate teams, accountability and ministerial oversight. From inside the Treasury building, making tough decisions about spending allocations, it is logical to single out each department separately.

The consequences of artificial separation between departments have long been seeping into our collective experience of public provision

And so, over the years of spending restraint, the notion of departments protected from deep cuts (health and education) and those unprotected (the rest, including local government) has defined parameters. Now, once again, ahead of a stringent summer Spending Review, unprotected departments are being required to model up to 11% reductions.

On an individual level, there is a deep interconnection between the outcomes each department is responsible for. Education is a big determinant of job prospects. Unemployment impacts health, which is a barrier to employment. And lots of people out of work mean rising welfare costs.

The consequences of artificial separation between departments have long been seeping into our collective experience of public provision. Reduced spending in one area creates rising costs in another.

For example, as unprotected social care is pared back, unmet demand pops up in protected, but rising, health budgets. The false divide has become a false economy – acute costs mount while the case for preventative investment upfront to alleviate crises is all the harder.

The Spending Review is an opportunity to shift spending towards long-term, mission-aligned objectives even within a tough fiscal climate – but the Government needs to end the false divide between protected and unprotected departments.

Bridging national policy silos and individual experiences, it is across places that budgets can be pooled, services can integrate around community needs and better overall outcomes can be more effectively sustained.

Jessica Studdert is chief executive at New Local

FINANCE

Forging the future

By Martin Ford | 25 June 2025

With the sector in crisis and the need for radical change, fundamental questions are being asked about what local government is for. Martin Ford reports.

FINANCE

Spending Review: Little room for a more preventative approach to health

By Andria Mastroianni | 17 June 2025

Andria Mastroianni says relying on council tax to fill funding gaps risks exacerbating, rather than narrowing, existing inequality.

FINANCE

Council tax hikes will do the heavy lifting

By Kate Ogden | 17 June 2025

Surprisingly, local government wasn’t at the end of the queue for the chancellor’s cash – or at the front – but it is the upcoming consultation on funding re...

FINANCE

SEND before spend

By Rob Powell | 17 June 2025

The impact of any failure to fully address SEND deficits will dwarf the benefits of the positive aspects of the Spending Review, and extending the statutory ...

Jessica Studdert

Popular articles by Jessica Studdert