Title

PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

A shared definition of 'neighbourhoods' is important

Jessica Studdert says that for real impact at a hyperlocal level, neighbourhoods need to be considered 'as a core convening level for organising the services of the state and connecting these with the assets and energies of communities'.

(C) jess-studdert/LinkedIn

(C) jess-studdert/LinkedIn

Neighbourhoods seem to be having a bit of a policy moment. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government's Plan for Neighbourhoods identifies 75 ‘left behind' areas that will each receive £20m over 10 years to fund locally-identified improvements.

The Government's plan for a ‘neighbourhood health service' intends to strengthen community-based health and social care. Meanwhile, the Independent Commission on Neighbourhoods is raising the profile of the hyperlocal level in policymaking across Whitehall.

This all aligns with how many councils are evolving neighbourhood working, aware of sharp, persistent differences in outcomes of different geographic communities within borough boundaries. Moving beyond common practice of ward budgets and co-located services, many are developing locality-based multidisciplinary hubs which deeply engage communities through asset-based practice, and rethinking corporate strategies to be more responsive to varying community needs.

This is all promising – the postcode lottery of life chances, whereby life expectancy can vary significantly even between proximate localities, has persisted for decades. Yet from the neighbourhood renewal strategies of the 2000s to the renewed focus of today, there is a risk that more single initiatives won't get us much further.

For real impact at a hyperlocal level, we need to consider neighbourhoods as a core convening level for organising the services of the state and connecting these with the assets and energies of communities. This would mean currently disconnected initiatives coming from different departments need to be better aligned around a single vision for place. Within that, a shared definition of ‘neighbourhoods' is important – currently the NHS sees them as much larger than do local authorities, for example.

There is an opportunity within devolution, reorganisation and public service reform more generally, to consider how we can integrate activity at a meaningful level for people and really begin to shift the dial on outcomes.

Jessica Studdert is chief executive at New Local

PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

Just like the weather, councils are rarely stable

By Blair McPherson | 20 April 2026

It is tempting to think the local government system is fundamentally stable, but this is seldom the case, says Blair McPherson. Leadership is learning to lea...

PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

'One size fits all' rules for the Government when it comes to planning committees

By Ian Miller | 20 April 2026

Setting 13 as the maximum size of planning committees might suit district councils, says Ian Miller. ‘But it means planning will be the preserve of only a sm...

PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

Fiscal devolution: A test of seriousness for government and places

By Mike Emmerich | 20 April 2026

If government and mayoral strategic authorities are willing to match fiscal responsibility and the retention of the proceeds of growth within agreed paramete...

PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM

Does the public care about local government reorganisation?

By Michael Burton | 20 April 2026

So far, the public has been pretty disengaged from consultation over the future shape of LGR, but as the new councils are announced residents may rapidly cha...

Jessica Studdert

Popular articles by Jessica Studdert