Title

REORGANISATION

Keeping options open

Norse Group’s Justin Galliford looks at how partnership can help councils preserve choice through local government reorganisation.

© PeopleImages / Shutterstock

© PeopleImages / Shutterstock

F or new unitary councils establishing shadow authorities, the immediate priority is meeting safe and legal requirements. With organisations, teams, democratic processes and essential services to bring together, attention is understandably focused on vesting day. Yet local government reorganisation is also a rare chance to rethink delivery, secure economies of scale and improve value for money.

The difficulty is that ambition and capacity rarely align. New unitaries may need to retain existing service arrangements from day one while integration follows later. Adult social care and children's services will rightly demand focus, leaving limited scope to redesign other services immediately.

Councils therefore need to keep long-term options open. Realigning services such as waste, environmental, facility management and property can reduce cost and improve resilience, but takes time to do well. Local authorities need a route that protects continuity while allowing transformation and savings to start sooner.

The usual options all carry risk. Outsourcing can lock councils into contracts that lack the flexibility complex integration requires. Traditional insourcing can add cost and demand capacity that may not exist, while creating a wholly owned trading company from scratch requires significant resource, expertise and investment.

So what is the answer? In my view, a partnership LATCo offers a practical middle way: control and flexibility without the burden of creating a company alone. Co-owned by the local authority and an established LATCo, it can use existing systems, people and commercial know-how to maintain services, unlock scale and bring forward savings.

A defined period – perhaps five years – gives the new local authority time to complete wider integration and shape its long-term strategy. After that, all options remain open: continuing the partnership, taking full ownership, bringing services in-house or going to market from a stronger position.

At Norse, we have developed council joint ventures for more than two decades. At their best, these models combine commercial discipline with a public service ethos, supporting external trading, shared returns and reinvestment in communities. As councils navigate local government reorganisation, partnership should be seen not as an end point, but as a way to keep choices open.

 

Justin Galliford is CEO of Norse Group

REORGANISATION

Finding a permanent solution to a temporary problem

By Rebecca Davis | 30 July 2026

Using the results from a recent service set up in the West Midlands, Rebecca Davis reveals how collaborative regional recruitment can empower councils to red...

REORGANISATION

How to keep away from the cliff edge and thrive

By Steve Guest | 30 July 2026

Nicola Chiverton and Steve Guest outline how, with the right planning and leadership development, a period of significant change and challenges can become on...

REORGANISATION

Let's treat heritage buildings as civic infrastructure

By Jonathan Werran | 29 July 2026

Jonathan Werran asks if heritage buildings can prove an unlikely policy winner for a prime minister with a degree in English literature from Cambridge.

REORGANISATION

Total Place: Still all about leadership

By Stephen Taylor | 29 July 2026

Stephen Taylor and Max Wide reflect on the lessons from Total Place 1.0 and the implications for Total Place 2.0 and conclude the need for bold, mature, cons...

Popular articles by Justin Galliford