WHITEHALL

PAC: Government overstated Troubled Families effectiveness

The Government has ‘overstated’ the effectiveness of its Troubled Families programme and been ‘evasive’ in its dealings with MPs, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has said.

The Government has ‘overstated' the effectiveness of its Troubled Families programme and been ‘evasive' in its dealings with MPs, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has said today.

The Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) considered families to be ‘turned around' on the basis of short-term outcomes rather than ‘long-term, sustainable change in families' lives,' the committee found. 

MPs also argued that the Government's claim the programme had saved £1.2bn was an ‘overstatement'.

The PAC report also chastised the Government for delaying the publication of the programme's phase one evaluation.

‘The department was evasive when explaining the reasons for this delay, furthering the impression that government is reluctant to be open and transparent about the Troubled Families programme,' the PAC said.

The committee also urged the DCLG to review its use of payment by results, which it claimed led ‘some councils attempting to move families through the programme quickly, potentially at the expense of reduced quality of support'.

PAC chair Meg Hiller said: ‘Government officials might be inclined to consider our comments on the delay in publishing its Troubled Families evaluation as a slap on the wrist about Whitehall bureaucracy.

‘Let me assure them that given the ambitions for this programme, the implications for families and the significant sums of money invested, it is far more serious than that.'

Senior civil servants have defended their work, telling the PAC there had been improvements in 116,000 families but it was difficult to prove ‘beyond statistical doubt' that success could be ascribed to the programme.

A government spokesman said: 'As the PAC report recognises, the Troubled Families programme enabled local authorities to expand and transform the way local services work with families.

'But, of course, there will always be lessons to learn and we have already made significant improvements to the second stage of the programme.

'We will look carefully at the evidence to find out how we can improve the programme further to help some of the most vulnerable people in our society.'

 

WHITEHALL

Geography of power: Relocating Whitehall to the regions

By David Werran | 24 April 2025

The political and economic case for an exodus from Whitehall to regional hubs is compelling and could become the catalyst for meaningful civil service reform...

WHITEHALL

Call for caution over land value capture reform

By Martin Ford | 23 April 2025

Experts have urged against wholesale reform of developer contributions despite the flaws within the current system.

WHITEHALL

Culture eats governance for breakfast

By Rachael Morris | 17 April 2025

Are we just paying lip service to good governance? The culture of an organisation needs to support and reinforce this concept in order for it to be a success...

WHITEHALL

Rushmoor appoints interim manging director

By Martin Ford | 16 April 2025

Ian Harrison has been named as interim managing director at Rushmoor BC.

Popular articles by William Eichler