Title

FINANCE

The problem with productivity plans

The final finance settlement contained some welcome changes, but they are one-off repairs that don’t provide long-term, sustainable funding solutions for districts or other councils, says Ian Miller.

The final local government finance settlement has brought some welcome news.

The minimum increase in core spending power of 4% mainly benefits district councils. Some also benefit from the 16% increase in rural services delivery grant. £3m will protect others from the worst impacts of internal drainage board levies. Welcome changes, but they are one-off sticking plasters that don't provide long-term, sustainable funding solutions for districts or other councils.

Asking local authorities for ‘productivity plans setting out how they will improve service performance and reduce wasteful expenditure' shows the Government doesn't understand the problem with local government funding is the quantum and its distribution, not councils' efficiency.

How productive was time spent on lobbying for extra resources, when it was obvious the provisional settlement was inadequate?

Local government staffing fell 31% between Q3 2010 and Q3 2023. Population and housing growth mean many fewer council staff are serving more people than before, with greater demand for services – such as collecting waste from more households.

Where does the problem with productivity lie? Staff numbers in central government (including the NHS) grew by 32% from 2010 to 2023. Civil service numbers grew by 27% in the seven years from 2016, including 16,000 more between September 2022 and September 2023 (+3.1%).

In 2022-23 TV Licensing spent £137m collecting £3.7bn from 24.4m households. The estimated evasion rate is 10%. That amount could be raised by less than 1p on the basic rate of income tax, evasion would fall very substantially (employers are fairly good at deducting the tax) and the £137m cost of collection would be saved. The courts service would save money as prosecutions for non-payment would cease.

I predict we won't see any such central government productivity saving in the chancellor's budget. Yet the Government can find time and civil servants to review and monitor productivity plans, while councils have to squeeze their activities yet further in order to write them. You couldn't make it up.

Ian Miller is chief executive of Wyre Forest DC

X – @IanM65

FINANCE

Why place matters: building a nuclear robotics future in Cumbria

By Kirsty Hewitson | 01 September 2026

Place-based investment can turn overlooked regions into national centres of innovation and growth, says Kirsty Hewitson.

FINANCE

Building a better system on the go

By Andy Begley | 27 August 2026

Andy Begley says the biggest problem with local government reorganisation may not be getting the structure wrong, but getting it right and failing to improve...

FINANCE

Sector split on direction of Government's housebuilding boost

By William Eichler | 26 August 2026

The Government’s funding boost for housebuilding has split the sector, with rural councils hitting out at ‘virtually all’ the first tranche going to cities.

FINANCE

Councils urged to pool buying powers to back British steel

By Ann McGauran | 26 August 2026

The chief executive and leader of North Lincolnshire Council have written to every English council asking them to use their ‘collective buying power' to supp...

Ian Miller

Popular articles by Ian Miller