Title

BUSINESS

Risks with council-owned companies

A clear, systematic framework is needed that underpins arrangements for overseeing and engaging with their companies to ensure councils’ interests are safeguarded, says chief executive of Local Partnerships Sean Hanson.

I have recently observed a rise in local authorities identifying concerns about council-owned companies and, more specifically, wanting to understand if their governance structures and processes for managing the related risks are sufficiently robust.

This issue has escalated in part due to the pandemic which has exposed areas where excessive risk has been taken, most notably in matters outside of councils' day to day activities, such as energy supply.

Councils are looking to review risks relating to their companies and to establish whether they are effectively managed and scrutinised. Different types of companies will be exposed to different risks. For example, development or asset-based companies will be impacted by changes in the Prudential framework which prevents acquisition purely for yield purposes. Service-based companies may be impacted by risks relating to Teckal constraints around growth or controlling of overheads.

A clear, systematic framework is needed that underpins arrangements for overseeing and engaging with companies to ensure councils' interests are safeguarded. It is critical to have a clear set of KPIs driven by the strategy and business planning process against which senior company staff are performance managed.

Getting the right composition of boards is also conducive to good governance and to minimising the scope for conflicts of interest. Company boards are often a mix of council officers, members and independent directors. However, there is often an opportunity to improve board skills and expertise through greater use of independent directors with both local government and market-specific experience, as well as through ongoing professional training for all board members.

A well-defined business case should sit at the heart of any council-owned company. This will ensure that the use of public resources will not distort a functioning market and challenge market-tested assumptions to avoid ‘optimism bias'.

Once established, councils should continually re-assess the business case and challenge the ongoing existence and relevance of their entities and the extent to which their objectives remain relevant over the company's lifetime.

It can be difficult for councils to balance competing drivers, such as allowing a company the freedom to manage activities without interference, and ensuring that it is held to account for its actions. Local Partnerships helps councils to examine these issues and establish effective governance structures that strike the appropriate balance.

Sean Hanson is chief executive of Local Partnerships

Sean.Hanson@localpartnerships.gov.uk

@LP_SeanHanson

BUSINESS

Balancing UK industrial strategy with Local Growth Plans

By Paige Portal | 27 October 2025

Paige Portal looks at whether local government can balance the Industrial Strategy’s national priorities with their own regional strengths and distinct needs.

BUSINESS

What is the baseline for an AI use policy?

By Iain Simmons | 27 October 2025

Iain Simmons sets out the minimum requirements for an effective AI use policy which can be adapted to businesses and organisations of every size.

BUSINESS

Transforming public services in Liverpool City Region

By Kirsty McLean | 24 October 2025

Kirsty McLean reveals how the Liverpool-based Office for Public Service Innovation – working with the Cabinet Office’s Test, Learn and Grow programme – is la...

BUSINESS

How do you use council cash to make a difference?

By By Adele Taylor | 23 October 2025

In the thick of local authority budgeting, it can be hard to build a business case for investment. Adele Taylor suggests looking for the most creative ways t...

Popular articles by Sean Hanson