SPENDING REVIEW

Spending Review: Green Book reforms revealed

The Treasury has announced reforms to guidance that provides a framework for how public sector organisations should appraise, develop and evaluate policies, programmes and projects.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves © Kirsty O’Connor/No 10 Downing Street

Chancellor Rachel Reeves © Kirsty O’Connor/No 10 Downing Street

The Treasury has announced reforms to guidance that provides a framework for how public sector organisations should appraise, develop and evaluate policies, programmes and projects. 

Under existing Green Book rules, Treasury decision-makers often focused heavily on narrow cost-benefit analysis – mainly prioritising maximum economic return per pound.

Spending Review documents said the Government would implement a ‘new approach' by reforming the Green Book and how it will be used to provide ‘objective, transparent advice on public investment across the country'.

The Treasury said it would introduce ‘place-based business cases', bringing together the projects needed to achieve the objectives of a particular place. 

It promised to ‘simplify and shorten' the Green Book and the accompanying business case guides, with an updated document to be published at the start of next year.

The documents promised to ban the use of ‘arbitrary benefit-cost ratio thresholds as a simple means of determining if a project should be funded' and ‘improve the Green Book guidance on transformational change to help public servants better assess the potential of projects to bring about growth'.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: ‘Our new Green Book will support place-based business cases and make sure no region has Treasury guidance wielded against them.'

The changes, which had been called for by Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Liverpool city region mayor Steve Rotheram, are expected to shift public spending decisions away from London.

Chief executive of think-tank Localis, Jonathan Werran, said: ‘The revised Green Book will favour investment in particular parts of the country rather than where it is easiest to secure return on investment and is potentially bad news for place leaders in London and the greater South East.'

 

SPENDING REVIEW

Can reorganisation deliver its promises?

By Jason Lowther | 12 June 2025

As the latest round of reorganisation gets under way, Jason Lowther looks at what international research has to say about whether larger councils actually le...

SPENDING REVIEW

Spending Review: The implications for economic development and growth

By Nigel Wilcock | 12 June 2025

The importance of economic development within the Spending Review to managing the delivery of programmes continues to show why the profession will need to be...

SPENDING REVIEW

Spending Review: Reeves back fair pay agreement

By William Eichler | 11 June 2025

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has backed a fair pay agreement for social care workers in the Spending Review.

SPENDING REVIEW

Spending Review: Reeves pledges to put sector on 'sustainable footing'

By Heather Jameson | 11 June 2025

Health, defence and schools were the big winners in the Spending Review, but Whitehall claimed it would put local government back on a 'sustainable footing'.

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters