Title

SPENDING REVIEW

Spending Review: Green Book reforms revealed

The Treasury has announced reforms to guidance that provides a framework for how public sector organisations should appraise, develop and evaluate policies, programmes and projects.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves © Kirsty O’Connor/No 10 Downing Street

Chancellor Rachel Reeves © Kirsty O’Connor/No 10 Downing Street

The Treasury has announced reforms to guidance that provides a framework for how public sector organisations should appraise, develop and evaluate policies, programmes and projects. 

Under existing Green Book rules, Treasury decision-makers often focused heavily on narrow cost-benefit analysis – mainly prioritising maximum economic return per pound.

Spending Review documents said the Government would implement a ‘new approach' by reforming the Green Book and how it will be used to provide ‘objective, transparent advice on public investment across the country'.

The Treasury said it would introduce ‘place-based business cases', bringing together the projects needed to achieve the objectives of a particular place. 

It promised to ‘simplify and shorten' the Green Book and the accompanying business case guides, with an updated document to be published at the start of next year.

The documents promised to ban the use of ‘arbitrary benefit-cost ratio thresholds as a simple means of determining if a project should be funded' and ‘improve the Green Book guidance on transformational change to help public servants better assess the potential of projects to bring about growth'.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: ‘Our new Green Book will support place-based business cases and make sure no region has Treasury guidance wielded against them.'

The changes, which had been called for by Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Liverpool city region mayor Steve Rotheram, are expected to shift public spending decisions away from London.

Chief executive of think-tank Localis, Jonathan Werran, said: ‘The revised Green Book will favour investment in particular parts of the country rather than where it is easiest to secure return on investment and is potentially bad news for place leaders in London and the greater South East.'

 

SPENDING REVIEW

Prevention, neighbourhoods and the long game

By Ansaf Azhar | 28 May 2026

New evidence from Oxfordshire suggests this is not the moment to step back on health inequalities, says Ansaf Azhar.

SPENDING REVIEW

Fair Funding: Have rural councils in England really lost out?

By Gabriel Stewart | 26 May 2026

When it comes to spending power, urban councils will soar ahead of rural councils by 2028-29, according to LGA figures. But exclusive Institute for Fiscal St...

SPENDING REVIEW

May 8: The day city regions fractured from within

By David Marlow | 21 May 2026

David Marlow says the post-7 May political composition of England’s six Integrated Settlement Mayoral Combined Authorities did not only shake up who runs cou...

SPENDING REVIEW

Reform's good local government problems

By Ann McGauran | 20 May 2026

Ben Bradley talks to Ann McGauran about the implications of Reform UK’s huge election gains for reorganisation and delivering efficiencies – and he shares th...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters