HUMAN RESOURCES

Senior officers doctored dismissal letter, tribunal finds

Senior officers conspired to doctor a dismissal letter in a bid to make it look like it was signed before a grievance procedure was launched against their council, a tribunal has found.

Senior officers conspired to doctor a dismissal letter in a bid to make it look like it was signed before a grievance procedure was launched against their council, a tribunal has found.

Hammersmith and Fulham LBC's ‘chief executive, interim head of corporate services, strategic director of governance and finance and section 151 officer and the borough solicitor and monitoring officer were all involved in this deception,' according to the tribunal report.

The borough's former director of public service reform, Rachael Wright-Turner, brought proceedings for unfair dismissal against the council and its chief executive, Kim Smith, after she was dismissed while on sick leave.

She also brought claims of disability discrimination citing ADHD and post-traumatic stress disorder which she suffered after working on the Grenfell response in her role as a tri-borough director.

Ms Wright-Turner had her probationary period extended after she was taken to A&E when she became distressed in the pub, following a difficult meeting with Ms Smith. The tribunal rejected claims by the chief executive and former interim director of HR Mark Grimley that her probation had been extended prior to her hospital visit.

After an extended period of sick leave, Ms Wright-Turner launched a grievance against the council on 1 August. A letter dismissing her, signed by Hammersmith and Fulham's strategic director for finance and governance, Hitesh Jolapara on behalf of the chief executive, was dated 31 July. However, the tribunal found evidence the letter was signed after the grievance claim was launched.  

The tribunal found the council and chief executive had harassed and discriminated against Ms Wright-Turner and the council had failed to deal with the disciplinary procedures properly. However, not all the instances of harassment and discrimination were upheld.

A spokesperson for the council said: ‘We are disappointed and fundamentally disagree with the tribunal's judgement. We are studying it carefully and considering our options.'

HUMAN RESOURCES

Cross-border lessons in devo

By Heather Jameson | 11 June 2025

Devolution may be new for some English authorities, but it is a quarter of a century on in Scotland. Does the Scottish system need a rethink in light of new ...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Three years left to live?

By Dan Peters | 02 June 2025

Reorganisation proposals for Surrey have sparked divisions, even between councils with the same party colours. Dan Peters talks to the key players and hears ...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Defending growth

By Paul Marinko | 22 May 2025

Alongside next month’s Spending Review the Government will announce its Industrial Strategy, but are the growth plans for regions too similar and are combine...

HUMAN RESOURCES

Why the Total Place bandwagon should roll again

By Michael Burton | 15 May 2025

John Denham was Labour’s communities secretary 15 years before Angela Rayner. He tells Michael Burton why he would not have embarked on wholescale local gove...

Heather Jameson

Popular articles by Heather Jameson