Title

FINANCE

Lack of commitment on Adjustment Support Grant could be significant for some councils

Tracy Bingham says that while the one-off Adjustment Support Grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three of the multi-year settlement. 'This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.'

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With the 2025-26 financial year now closed and accounts preparation well under way, planning for 2026-27 is visible on the horizon. 

Despite us now living with the first multi-year settlement in a decade, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has said from the outset that an annual consultation will still take place each year.

It remains to be seen whether this will prove any lighter than consultations under single-year settlements, especially as there should be relatively limited scope for change.

Those involved in business rates pools will be keen to influence future arrangements for the sharing of pooling gains and the ongoing treatment of the Adjustment Support Grant.

The £116m grant was introduced as a one-off measure to protect authorities whose core spending power would reduce because of changes made between the provisional and final settlement. This rebalanced the distribution of income from pools between tariff and top-up authorities, correcting an earlier assumption that pooling gains accrued entirely to tariff authorities (typically district councils) and moving instead to a 50:50 share.

While the one-off grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three. This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.

It is also worth remembering that the arrangement now in play could be argued to be as imprecise as the original approach.

In practice, the distribution of pooling gains is a locally-agreed convention and varies across the 25 pooling areas and 188 councils affected. There is therefore a strong case for the MHCLG to better understand these local arrangements and reflect them more accurately within its distribution methodology.

Tracy Bingham is deputy chief executive (S151 officer) and executive director – resources and transformation at South Derbyshire DC

FINANCE

Managing councils without a majority

By Colin Mellors | 27 May 2026

Officials in councils with no overall political control will need to use high levels of political nous, personal acumen, trust and brokering skills over the ...

FINANCE

Fair Funding: Have rural councils in England really lost out?

By Gabriel Stewart | 26 May 2026

When it comes to spending power, urban councils will soar ahead of rural councils by 2028-29, according to LGA figures. But exclusive Institute for Fiscal St...

FINANCE

May 8: The day city regions fractured from within

By David Marlow | 21 May 2026

David Marlow says the post-7 May political composition of England’s six Integrated Settlement Mayoral Combined Authorities did not only shake up who runs cou...

FINANCE

English devolution: Redefining mayoral scrutiny

By Natalie Rotherham | 20 May 2026

Natalie Rotherham says scrutiny is becoming a core pillar of England’s evolving devolved governance system, with mayoral accountability now expected to match...

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham