Title

FINANCE

Lack of commitment on Adjustment Support Grant could be significant for some councils

Tracy Bingham says that while the one-off Adjustment Support Grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three of the multi-year settlement. 'This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.'

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With the 2025-26 financial year now closed and accounts preparation well under way, planning for 2026-27 is visible on the horizon. 

Despite us now living with the first multi-year settlement in a decade, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has said from the outset that an annual consultation will still take place each year.

It remains to be seen whether this will prove any lighter than consultations under single-year settlements, especially as there should be relatively limited scope for change.

Those involved in business rates pools will be keen to influence future arrangements for the sharing of pooling gains and the ongoing treatment of the Adjustment Support Grant.

The £116m grant was introduced as a one-off measure to protect authorities whose core spending power would reduce because of changes made between the provisional and final settlement. This rebalanced the distribution of income from pools between tariff and top-up authorities, correcting an earlier assumption that pooling gains accrued entirely to tariff authorities (typically district councils) and moving instead to a 50:50 share.

While the one-off grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three. This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.

It is also worth remembering that the arrangement now in play could be argued to be as imprecise as the original approach.

In practice, the distribution of pooling gains is a locally-agreed convention and varies across the 25 pooling areas and 188 councils affected. There is therefore a strong case for the MHCLG to better understand these local arrangements and reflect them more accurately within its distribution methodology.

Tracy Bingham is deputy chief executive (S151 officer) and executive director – resources and transformation at South Derbyshire DC

FINANCE

Fiscal devolution: Significant steps away from the centre

By Marcus Johns | 03 November 2026

Marcus Johns sets out the three key features of the Budget’s fiscal devolution roadmap and says the changes signal a future ‘where Britain escapes its status...

FINANCE

Ask young people first: what a new town taught me about planning for the next generation

By Saeed Atcha | 02 November 2026

Saeed Atcha looks at what happened when Ebbsfleet Development Corporation asked more than 300 young people what kind of place they wanted, and what councils ...

FINANCE

Levelling out uneven social care provision

By Rosie Fogden | 29 October 2026

Fixing the postcode penalty for social care is key if growth is to reach all places, say Ben Franklin and Rosie Fogden.

FINANCE

A balanced first step on fiscal devolution

By David Phillips | 29 October 2026

The fiscal devolution roadmap makes it clear the system will allow areas to gain financially from growth, but with guardrails in place to cap the biggest fal...

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham

-->