Title

FINANCE

Lack of commitment on Adjustment Support Grant could be significant for some councils

Tracy Bingham says that while the one-off Adjustment Support Grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three of the multi-year settlement. 'This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.'

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With the 2025-26 financial year now closed and accounts preparation well under way, planning for 2026-27 is visible on the horizon. 

Despite us now living with the first multi-year settlement in a decade, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has said from the outset that an annual consultation will still take place each year.

It remains to be seen whether this will prove any lighter than consultations under single-year settlements, especially as there should be relatively limited scope for change.

Those involved in business rates pools will be keen to influence future arrangements for the sharing of pooling gains and the ongoing treatment of the Adjustment Support Grant.

The £116m grant was introduced as a one-off measure to protect authorities whose core spending power would reduce because of changes made between the provisional and final settlement. This rebalanced the distribution of income from pools between tariff and top-up authorities, correcting an earlier assumption that pooling gains accrued entirely to tariff authorities (typically district councils) and moving instead to a 50:50 share.

While the one-off grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three. This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.

It is also worth remembering that the arrangement now in play could be argued to be as imprecise as the original approach.

In practice, the distribution of pooling gains is a locally-agreed convention and varies across the 25 pooling areas and 188 councils affected. There is therefore a strong case for the MHCLG to better understand these local arrangements and reflect them more accurately within its distribution methodology.

Tracy Bingham is deputy chief executive (S151 officer) and executive director – resources and transformation at South Derbyshire DC

FINANCE

Why Welsh councils need sustainability

By Andrew Morgan | 11 June 2026

As Andrew Morgan prepares to step down as leader of the Welsh Local Government Association, he says the relationship between the Welsh Government and council...

FINANCE

Market-shaping councils, better housing outcomes

By Joanne Drew | 11 June 2026

Joanne Drew considers the role of councils in enabling housing delivery and shaping local housing markets and why Enfield LBC created a First Time Buyers Com...

FINANCE

Unlocking the true power of culture

By Heather Jameson | 11 June 2026

Bradford’s year as City of Culture may be over, but it has left an imprint on the people and place. The MJ, Gatenby Sanderson and Bradford City Council broug...

FINANCE

Lessons from Swansea: A collaborative approach to addressing poverty stigma

By Amanda Hill-Dixon | 11 June 2026

Amanda Hill-Dixon sets out evidence-informed actions for councils to reduce poverty stigma through universal services, dignified support, inclusive communica...

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham