Title

FINANCE

Lack of commitment on Adjustment Support Grant could be significant for some councils

Tracy Bingham says that while the one-off Adjustment Support Grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three of the multi-year settlement. 'This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.'

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With the 2025-26 financial year now closed and accounts preparation well under way, planning for 2026-27 is visible on the horizon. 

Despite us now living with the first multi-year settlement in a decade, the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) has said from the outset that an annual consultation will still take place each year.

It remains to be seen whether this will prove any lighter than consultations under single-year settlements, especially as there should be relatively limited scope for change.

Those involved in business rates pools will be keen to influence future arrangements for the sharing of pooling gains and the ongoing treatment of the Adjustment Support Grant.

The £116m grant was introduced as a one-off measure to protect authorities whose core spending power would reduce because of changes made between the provisional and final settlement. This rebalanced the distribution of income from pools between tariff and top-up authorities, correcting an earlier assumption that pooling gains accrued entirely to tariff authorities (typically district councils) and moving instead to a 50:50 share.

While the one-off grant was intended to offset a reduction in funding, it was not committed for years two and three. This could be significant for some authorities, particularly when these councils are also supporting reorganisation, meaning capacity is stretched and opportunities for savings is limited.

It is also worth remembering that the arrangement now in play could be argued to be as imprecise as the original approach.

In practice, the distribution of pooling gains is a locally-agreed convention and varies across the 25 pooling areas and 188 councils affected. There is therefore a strong case for the MHCLG to better understand these local arrangements and reflect them more accurately within its distribution methodology.

Tracy Bingham is deputy chief executive (S151 officer) and executive director – resources and transformation at South Derbyshire DC

FINANCE

Do devolution differently: without LGR

By Colin Copus | 14 August 2026

Steve Leach and Colin Copus write an open letter to the Prime Minister urging the government to rethink local government reorganisation and strengthen devolu...

FINANCE

The real leadership challenge begins after the appointment

By Pete John | 13 August 2026

The sector spends heavily to appoint the right people, but often withdraws support at the moment the job gets hardest. Pete John says it is time we thought d...

FINANCE

Tourism costs

By Ann McGauran | 12 August 2026

Bath is a tourism destination delivering an ambitious programme of commercial regeneration. But it is calling for more support from government above and beyo...

FINANCE

Untangling the wires to progress

By Martin Ford | 12 August 2026

The Government has finally unveiled it proposals to ‘rewire the state’ and devolve powers to regional and local levels. Martin Ford delves into the document.

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham