Title

WHITEHALL

Queen's Speech: Controversial voter ID plans roll forward

Voter ID is expected to be introduced by May 2023 after the Government pledged to introduce legislation to ‘ensure the integrity of elections’.

Voter ID is expected to be introduced by May 2023 after the Government pledged to introduce legislation to ‘ensure the integrity of elections'.

Today's Queen's Speech said the Government would ‘strengthen and renew democracy and the constitution,' which is expected through an Electoral Integrity Bill.

The Government made a manifesto commitment to introduce voter ID, arguing it would protect voters from having their vote stolen, and insisting it would not have a negative effect on turnout nor participation.

But chief executive of the Association of Electoral Administrators, Peter Stanyon, said the rate of progress needed to introduce voter ID in time for the next General Election was a 'concern'.

A previous Queen's Speech in December 2019 pledged to roll out voter ID for UK parliamentary elections in Great Britain and local elections in England.

The Electoral Commission has called for voter ID for the last seven years though it has admitted that there was ‘no evidence of large-scale electoral fraud' and has estimated that almost 3.5 million people do not have suitable identification.

Ministers declared pilots held in 2018 and 2019 a success but critics have pointed to the very low level of polling station fraud and have questioned whether there are bigger priorities, such as improving voter registration rates and preventing postal voting fraud.

Dozens of civil society groups have spoken out against the plans – from Age UK to Stonewall, Liberty, Operation Black Vote, Silver Voices and Centrepoint.

Director of policy and research at the Electoral Reform Society campaign group, Jess Garland, said the pilots had ‘failed to allay concerns that legitimate voters would be denied a say if this policy was rolled out'.

She said: ‘Voting is safe and secure in the UK, meaning this policy is just an unnecessary barrier to democratic participation.

'Ministers need to listen to these concerns and drop these costly plans.

‘These proposals will make it harder to vote for huge numbers of voters, locking ordinary people out of our democracy and unfairly discriminating against those who lack ID.

'Mandatory ID is an expensive distraction and the wrong priority right now.'

Shadow minister for young people and democracy, Cat Smith, described the Government's proposals as a ‘solution looking for a problem that doesn't exist'.

She said: ‘It doesn't matter how the Government dresses it up, these plans will make it harder for working class, older and black people to vote.'

Voters already have to provide ID before receiving a ballot paper in Northern Ireland, where there has been no evidence that the requirements have affected turnout.

WHITEHALL

Searching for a NEET solution

By Vijay K Luthra | 06 August 2026

With NEET numbers at their highest since 2013, Patrick Diamond and Vijay K Luthra argue the answer lies not in Whitehall, nor even in combined authorities, b...

WHITEHALL

No10 North: Whitehall reimagined

By Kate Josephs | 06 August 2026

As Andy Burnham launches No10 North to boost growth and devolution, former senior civil servant turned council chief executive Kate Josephs, suggests the re...

WHITEHALL

The severed links in health and care integration

By Martin Ford | 06 August 2026

Despite recognition of the benefits of closer integration between health and social care, recent months have seen a flurry of breakups in partnerships betwee...

WHITEHALL

EXCLUSIVE: Public rebuffed over reorganisation plans

By Paul Marinko | 30 July 2026

Ministers have gone against the public’s preferred reorganisation option in the majority of areas, The MJ can reveal.

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters