Title

FINANCE

Spring Statement: From panic mode to planning mode

Looking ahead to the Spending Review, this is a moment to embrace meaningful reform that addresses the root causes of the public service’s financial woes, says Iain Murray

(c) tech_BG / Shutterstock.com

(c) tech_BG / Shutterstock.com

The 2025 Spring Statement arrived at a precarious moment for local government. As demand for services surges and financial pressures mount, local authorities are teetering on the brink. But deeper, more sustainable reform is what's truly needed. What will it take for us to create sustainable public services that support the Government's ambitions for growth?

Local government running on empty

The Government's short-term fixes have, for now, delayed the prospect of more local authorities issuing Section 114 (S114) notices as part of the 2025/26 budget setting round. However, more councils needed Exceptional Financial Support (EFS) to avoid issuing S114s ahead of the 2025/26 financial year. 

With billions in revenue costs now shifted to the top half of balance sheets through EFS - and billions more hidden in SEND deficits at the bottom - there's no clearer sign that the system is on the verge of collapse. 

Recent funding settlements from both the previous and current governments have provided some temporary relief, but they fall far short of solving the deeper issue. Fundamentally, more money itself won't fix a broken system. What's needed is real, structural change that dares to answer the big questions: What are local authorities for? And how should they be funded sustainably?

Long-term vision: or are we stuck in the same old cycle?

I followed this week's statement closely, and one remark from the chancellor stood out to me: ‘Change doesn't happen overnight.' I couldn't agree more. But at the same time, change doesn't—and shouldn't—happen by accident or without a plan. And that's exactly what's still missing: a clear, long-term strategy for public services, particularly for local government.

The outcomes of the Spending Review now feel more significant than ever. It's a pivotal moment—an opportunity for the government to take public service reform seriously, to recognise that sustainable economic growth and prosperity are built on well-functioning, efficient public services. It's also a chance to break free from the cycle of short-term thinking that has held back progress and innovation for far too long.

That said, I find myself torn between hope and pragmatic scepticism.

The hope is easy to grasp. A Spending Review that lays out day-to-day spending plans until 2028-29, capital spending plans to 2029-30, and a 10-Year Infrastructure Strategy sounds like the perfect foundation for a long-term vision for the UK and its public services. In local government, we're already seeing ambitious structural changes—through reorganisation, new delivery models, and devolution—that could redefine how councils operate. These shifts present real opportunities to rethink how services are planned and delivered.

And once the initial shockwaves settle, the decision to abolish NHS England could pave the way for stronger local accountability, creating the conditions for more effective collaboration between local partners. There are, undeniably, reasons for optimism.

The scepticism is just as easy to grasp. Change doesn't just require a plan—it requires investment, and investment comes with costs. This week, the Government announced £14 billion in cuts, including politically uncomfortable reductions to the welfare bill. The chancellor needed these savings to rebalance the books and restore some fiscal headroom, but that headroom remains minimal and fragile.

At the same time, there's a clear commitment to reducing the size of the state. While there are undoubtedly opportunities to drive efficiencies and boost productivity through technology, it's naive to assume that digital transformation alone can fill the gaps in our public finances. There is a risk that rather than creating a smaller reductive state what we may end up with is managed decline.

Reform or regress?

As the Government looks ahead to the Spending Review, the choices made will shape the future. This is a moment to embrace meaningful reform —reform that addresses the root causes of the public service's financial woes.

Short-term fixes and incremental changes won't cut it. What's needed is bold, systemic change —change that ensures local services remain resilient and capable of meeting the needs of communities for years to come. 

The Spending Review will be the chance to reimagine the future. This time, we can't afford to miss the mark.

Iain Murray is CIPFA director of public financial management

 

 

 

 

FINANCE

It's time to maximise the opportunities

By Rachael Morris | 12 February 2026

Julie Towers and Rachael Morris of Penna share their experience of local government reorganisation and the impact, challenges and opportunities for talent at...

FINANCE

Connected devolution: Why LGR demands true partnership

By Emma Foy | 12 February 2026

Local government reorganisation offers an opportunity to reset how digital infrastructure supports communities, writes Emma Foy

FINANCE

Collective working can resolve our communities' biggest issues

By Tony Clements | 11 February 2026

Tony Clements says that in order to meet the needs of citizens, councils need new methods, new ways of thinking and opportunities to take measured risks they...

FINANCE

Reaping the benefits of collaboration on technology and innovation piece by piece

By Eddie Copeland | 11 February 2026

There is a powerful logic to making intelligent use of data, technology and a wide range of transformation methods at a regional level through models such as...

Popular articles by Iain Murray