Title

WHITEHALL

Centralisation is not a cosy cocoon

When Detroit went bust it seemed to prove the riskiness of local self-government, says Jessica Studdert. But Birmingham going into effective bankruptcy 'should end any naive assumptions the Whitehall model provides anything like a safety net'.

Ten years ago, the city of Detroit went bust. The combination of lost tax revenues from a declining population and rising expenses meant the city government effectively ran out of cash. A court bankruptcy was filed, triggering negotiations for adjustments in its financial obligations and state and federal support packages.

At the time, the reaction this side of the Atlantic was a combination of bewilderment and reassurance. Bewilderment at the US model of highly devolved Government, which left a big city in the position of not being able to meet its own population's needs. Reassurance that in our own highly centralised context, nothing like this could ever happen here. 

The episode seemed to prove the inherent riskiness of fiscal devolution and local self-government. Far better to be wrapped in the cosy cocoon of centralisation. What our own local authorities lack in autonomy, they gain from the security of a heavily controlled national system. 

Fast forward to 2023, and the picture doesn't look quite as rosy. The news that our second biggest city has gone bankrupt should end any naïve assumptions the Whitehall model provides anything like a safety net for local areas. Birmingham's declaration of a section 114 notice follows a string of other councils signalling similar dire financial straits. While each has its own circumstances, the wider policy discussion is slowly moving on from pathologising individual councils towards asking deeper questions about the degree of risk central Government is systematically placing on its local counterparts.

Demand pressures on services are rising – particularly in a city like Birmingham where 42%  of the population live in poverty. But councils must set balanced budgets and have little control over what resources they can access. Even Birmingham's reasonable request for a tourist tax to supplement the Commonwealth Games last year was refused by Government, let alone wider measures to generate the resources it needs.

While the US represents an extreme model of devolution, we must recognise our own highly centralised position. Both create unreasonable risks. There is a happy medium which combines sufficient funding to meet demand and the capacity to generate wider revenues. Let's keep this on the agenda. 

Jessica Studdert is deputy chief executive at New Local

X – @jesstud
 

WHITEHALL

Building trust, capacity and accountability in England's strategic authorities

By Sandy Forsyth | 04 June 2026

To address the complexities in the evolution of strategic authorities, devolution needs to work beyond the traditional metro mayoral model, says Sandy Forsyth.

WHITEHALL

What England can learn from Japan's approach to local government finance

By Naoki Fujiwara | 04 June 2026

Consideration of Japan’s approach to local government funding suggests possibilities for doing things differently in England and opens up space to think abou...

WHITEHALL

Governing through uncertainty – what happens next?

By Tim Farr | 04 June 2026

In an era of permanent uncertainty, Tim Farr assesses the challenges many local authorities, chief executives and senior leadership teams are now navigating ...

WHITEHALL

LGA chair to stand down

By Paul Marinko | 03 June 2026

Cllr Louise Gittins has today announced her intention to stand down as chair of the Local Government Association.

Jessica Studdert

Popular articles by Jessica Studdert