Title

BUSINESS RATES

Local government settlement shows Government is not in listening mode

It is clear from the final local government settlement that the Government did not pay attention to the submissions of councils, including districts, says Ian Miller. The consultation with the sector on council tax increases 'seems a sham', he adds.

The final local government settlement brought no cheer. The Government didn't listen to the representations that councils, including districts, submitted. New homes bonus allocations for 2021-22 will be based on housing growth in the 12 months to October 2020, using a 0.4% pre-COVID threshold. No account was taken of the impact of COVID on building during half of that period.

A higher threshold for the Mayor of London apart, there was no shift in proposals for criteria for ‘excessive' council tax increases. The Government presented no compelling reason why the maximum increase for districts should be 2% or £5, a figure that has applied for several years and has not been adjusted to allow for erosion in the value of money. Nor a reason why, in comparison, police and crime commissioners should be allowed to increase by up to £15. In many shires, police council tax has leap-frogged the district share. For councils, the consultation seems a sham. The decisions were taken long ago by the Treasury. The Spending Review on 25 November said ‘the referendum threshold for increases in council tax will remain at 2% in 2021-22' ignoring the statutory requirement to consult and the process for the House of Commons to approve the referendum principles.

The Ministry didn't listen to representations about the name of the new ‘lower tier services grant'. Districts are grateful for it (as are unitary councils who also benefit). It reinforces the Whitehall preoccupation with using unnecessarily hierarchical language. What would have been wrong with community services grant or local services grant?

The ‘request' for billing authorities not to send out business rates bills because of the Budget on 3 March gives the game away: there will be more reliefs, decided centrally. Billing in many councils would otherwise have been under way by then. If the approach devised by the Government requires software changes, there is a severe risk that getting out bills in time for instalments on 1 April will be jeopardised.

As always, Whitehall knows best.

Ian Miller is chief executive of Wyre Forest DC

@IanM65

BUSINESS RATES

Unlocking the true power of culture

By Heather Jameson | 11 June 2026

Bradford’s year as City of Culture may be over, but it has left an imprint on the people and place. The MJ, Gatenby Sanderson and Bradford City Council broug...

BUSINESS RATES

Lessons from Swansea: A collaborative approach to addressing poverty stigma

By Amanda Hill-Dixon | 11 June 2026

Amanda Hill-Dixon sets out evidence-informed actions for councils to reduce poverty stigma through universal services, dignified support, inclusive communica...

BUSINESS RATES

EXCLUSIVE: Chiefs lobby Government over severance payment threshold

By Dan Peters | 10 June 2026

Council chiefs have been lobbying the Government to relax the requirements around special severance payments when they publish guidance on reorganisation sta...

BUSINESS RATES

Council tax reform: Time to take a long hard look at the Valuation Office

By Simon Kaye | 10 June 2026

Simon Kaye says the public debate should not begin with winners and losers from hypothetical new council tax bands – it should start with the administrative ...

Ian Miller

Popular articles by Ian Miller