Title

LEADERSHIP

Why does it take so long to get things done in the public sector?

The public sector needs to pick up its pace, writes Adele Gritten

© Peera_stockfoto / shutterstock

© Peera_stockfoto / shutterstock

Since I joined Local Partnerships as chief executive, one question has stuck with me: why does the public sector move so much slower than the private sector? It's not a criticism of public service, as there's much to admire, but the pace of progress can be frustrating.

In the private sector, decisions are made with due dilligence but quickly. Stakeholders align, mobilise and move projects forward apace. Usually, there is a financial imperative to do so.

In contrast, public sector structures often hinder progress. Departments work in silos, duplicating efforts without anyone taking ownership of how programmes (and cost bases) overlap. Everyone can agree on the need for certain projects, but it can take an age for someone to step up and fund it (even when funds are available). In a private sector setting, these problems are often resolved within weeks, not months or years.

Another issue is capacity. Local government teams are constantly firefighting, dealing with immediate crises in health, housing and social care, leaving little time to think strategically. As a result, transformation projects stall because there's simply no breathing room to focus on the long term.

Then there's the culture of caution. Understandably, managing public funds requires prudence. But this can tip into overcaution, stifling innovation and new approaches. I've seen promising projects stall for months because people are wary of using funds differently.

Perhaps most frustrating is the slow decision making. In the private sector, time is money with meetings having to result in clear actions, ownership and timelines. In the public sector, meetings often focus on ‘reflections' without concrete next steps and a cast of thousands in attendance.

This isn't to say the public sector can't teach the private sector a thing or two. It can. But if we want to achieve meaningful change, we need faster collaboration, faster mobilisation, seniors prepared to put heads above parapets and a cultural shift from excessive, repetitive, silo dialogue to more consensual swift action. Never has this been more pertinent than in the context of impending local government reform.

Adele Gritten is chief executive of Local Partnerships

Localpartnerships.gov.uk

LEADERSHIP

Regeneration: Unpicking the new mayoral fund

By David Blackman | 16 December 2025

The Budget may not have pulled any rabbits out of the hat for growth and regeneration, but there were details on how the Mayoral Revolving Growth Fund will w...

LEADERSHIP

Leadership capacity – the key to social care reform

By Nik Shah | 11 December 2025

Nik Shah reflects on a survey that finds confidence in social care reform is rising, but confidence in the leadership pipeline isn’t.

LEADERSHIP

Delivering health and devo

By Louise Gittins | 10 December 2025

Cheshire and Merseyside are teaming up with local partners – and with Sir Michael Marmot and the Institute of Health Equity – to show how devolution can hard...

LEADERSHIP

GLL's Social Enterprise Accelerator – helping social entrepreneurs thrive

By Andy Bindon | 09 December 2025

Andy Bindon explains why leading UK charitable social enterprise and worker-owned co-op GLL wants to help more social entrepreneurs to start up and grow thei...

Popular articles by Adele Gritten