Title

GOVERNANCE

Warning against forced return to 'autocratic' cabinet system

Labour-led Sheffield City Council has warned against a forced return to the ‘autocratic, top-down decision-making cabinet system’.

Sheffield City Council (c) Alexey Fedorenko/Shutterstock

Sheffield City Council (c) Alexey Fedorenko/Shutterstock

Labour-led Sheffield City Council has warned against a forced return to the ‘autocratic, top-down decision-making cabinet system'.

Sheffield voted 65% to 35% in a 2021 referendum to change to a committee system after its strong leader cabinet model was criticised for its role in a scandal in which 17,500 street trees were chopped down.

Labour leader Tom Hunt has complained – along with Bristol City Council – that the sector was ‘not consulted' before the Government announced last month plans to legislate to abolish the committee system.

A motion passed by the council at its latest meeting read: ‘It is clearly wrong that a system that has been working well in Sheffield should be abolished without any form of consultation.

‘It benefits nobody in Sheffield to return to the autocratic, top-down decision-making cabinet system.'

In a letter to local government minster Jim McMahon, seen by The MJ, Sutton LBC leader Barry Lewis urged a ‘rethink'.

Cllr Lewis wrote: ‘If it ain't bust, don't fix it! This is not pushing power out of Whitehall into the hands of local leaders. It is an unhelpful top-down approach, which will impose costs and provide zero benefits to the public.'

A spokesperson for Kingston LBC added: ‘Our position, and the broader sentiment among many local authorities, is that this move represents centralisation by stealth, rather than genuine devolution.

‘The Government's rationale for this change appears flawed. Of the eight councils that have issued section 114 notices since 2012, none operated under the committee system.

‘We firmly believe that local authorities should retain the flexibility to adopt governance models that best reflect the unique needs and expectations of their communities. Imposing a one-size-fits-all structure risks undermining local autonomy and the democratic engagement of elected representatives.'

Bristol, which voted in favour of a committee system only three years ago, has called for the Government to ‘provide funding so that the substantial costs of further change isn't borne solely by local taxpayers'.

Chief executive of the Association of Democratic Services Officers, Charlotte Eisenhart, has questioned what ‘evidence or metrics are being used to make the judgement that the committee system should go'.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government did not respond to a request for comment.

GOVERNANCE

Attracting young talent to public sector careers

By Manny Sandhu | 29 October 2025

Manny Sandhu shares how a new pilot campaign – unveiled at the WMJobs Expo 2025 – is energising young people to explore careers in local government, showing ...

GOVERNANCE

New beginnings for DCN chair

By Martin Ford | 29 October 2025

As Richard Wright takes the reins as chair of the District Councils’ Network, he spoke to Martin Ford about the challenges that lie ahead.

GOVERNANCE

The move to digital networks: preparing local authorities for a connected future

By Professor Sultan Mahmud | 29 October 2025

BT is working with local authorities across the UK to prepare for one of the most significant network changes in decades: the move from the ageing copper tel...

GOVERNANCE

Why local growth promotes unity

By Tom Lloyd Goodwin | 28 October 2025

Tackling inequality isn’t just about investing in the high-growth sectors of the Industrial Strategy. Dr Tom Lloyd-Goodwin argues it’s time to turn attention...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters