Title

GOVERNANCE

Warning against forced return to 'autocratic' cabinet system

Labour-led Sheffield City Council has warned against a forced return to the ‘autocratic, top-down decision-making cabinet system’.

Sheffield City Council (c) Alexey Fedorenko/Shutterstock

Sheffield City Council (c) Alexey Fedorenko/Shutterstock

Labour-led Sheffield City Council has warned against a forced return to the ‘autocratic, top-down decision-making cabinet system'.

Sheffield voted 65% to 35% in a 2021 referendum to change to a committee system after its strong leader cabinet model was criticised for its role in a scandal in which 17,500 street trees were chopped down.

Labour leader Tom Hunt has complained – along with Bristol City Council – that the sector was ‘not consulted' before the Government announced last month plans to legislate to abolish the committee system.

A motion passed by the council at its latest meeting read: ‘It is clearly wrong that a system that has been working well in Sheffield should be abolished without any form of consultation.

‘It benefits nobody in Sheffield to return to the autocratic, top-down decision-making cabinet system.'

In a letter to local government minster Jim McMahon, seen by The MJ, Sutton LBC leader Barry Lewis urged a ‘rethink'.

Cllr Lewis wrote: ‘If it ain't bust, don't fix it! This is not pushing power out of Whitehall into the hands of local leaders. It is an unhelpful top-down approach, which will impose costs and provide zero benefits to the public.'

A spokesperson for Kingston LBC added: ‘Our position, and the broader sentiment among many local authorities, is that this move represents centralisation by stealth, rather than genuine devolution.

‘The Government's rationale for this change appears flawed. Of the eight councils that have issued section 114 notices since 2012, none operated under the committee system.

‘We firmly believe that local authorities should retain the flexibility to adopt governance models that best reflect the unique needs and expectations of their communities. Imposing a one-size-fits-all structure risks undermining local autonomy and the democratic engagement of elected representatives.'

Bristol, which voted in favour of a committee system only three years ago, has called for the Government to ‘provide funding so that the substantial costs of further change isn't borne solely by local taxpayers'.

Chief executive of the Association of Democratic Services Officers, Charlotte Eisenhart, has questioned what ‘evidence or metrics are being used to make the judgement that the committee system should go'.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government did not respond to a request for comment.

GOVERNANCE

The new fire and rehire regime: what you need to know

By Anna Scott | 12 September 2025

Rebecca McGuirk and Anna Scott look at details of the Employment Rights Bill and say if there are plans to vary terms and conditions over the next few months...

GOVERNANCE

Riding out the perfect storm

By Niall Bolger | 11 September 2025

Niall Bolger says communities are in crisis and leaders must respond with compassion, presence and values-led action to rebuild trust, counter hate and prote...

GOVERNANCE

Going beyond the job description

By Matt Jones | 11 September 2025

Matt Jones takes a look at the strategic value of interim leaders in local government

GOVERNANCE

Future Forum Midlands: Council chiefs have fewer derailers to success than private counterparts

By Paul Marinko | 10 September 2025

New research by recruitment specialists GatenbySanderson has found council chief executives have fewer 'derailers' to success than their counterparts in the ...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters