Title

FINANCE

Fair Funding Review 2.0: Transitional arrangements will be critical

Some councils may have reserves to support fair funding transition, but this is not sustainable long-term, says Tracy BIngham.

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With each passing year the case for funding reform has sharpened as structural pressures and funding gaps have become more acute. Until this year, the system seemingly evolved to divert funding away from the most deprived areas who receive the least against their assessed need.

The Fair Funding Review 2.0 lays out long-awaited changes. Total funding available won't increase and there are big changes planned around where it will go – towards more deprived areas and away from shire districts and some London boroughs. Whilst this blueprint is understood, the measurements remain unclear. There is helpful insight into indicative individual changes in need, but no full exemplification.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered?

Estimating next year's funding position therefore remains a modelling exercise. The sector is collaborating, and there's a growing sense of what the changes might mean for individual councils, but confidence remains informed rather than certain.

There's a sense of inevitability about the plans. We knew this change was coming and have scenario-modelled it, but its elusiveness over the years has made real preparation difficult.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered? The Government hasn't confirmed, but a 7% annual loss cap has been used illustratively. The relationship with council tax also needs attention – could additional tax-raising flexibilities be a right for those facing funding reductions, rather than an agreement upon request?

Some councils may have reserves to support transition, but this is not sustainable long-term. Moreover, reorganisation costs could undermine the benefits of reform in the short term unless they are acknowledged and supported.

We must also recognise that the broader and fundamental issue of council tax reform has not been addressed in the review. There is still much to work out.

 

Tracy Bingham is executive director – resources and transformation (s151 officer) at South Derbyshire DC

 

FINANCE

The challenges, opportunities and risks of devo

By Martin Ford | 29 January 2026

The Government’s drive for devolution is set to radically alter the landscape of local government. The National Audit Office (NAO) and The MJ brought togethe...

FINANCE

Good job we've been practising partnership working

By Mike Dearing | 29 January 2026

As the local government sector undergoes widespread change, the forging of relationships will be as important as the structures that emerge, writes Mike Dear...

FINANCE

The new reality of visible leadership

By Sunita Patel | 29 January 2026

Sunita Patel outlines how the need for community cohesion has presented an important challenge for today’s local leaders, and is affecting the way we recruit...

FINANCE

The NHS 10 Year Plan: Why listening at scale matters for local government

By Ruth Cousens | 28 January 2026

Ruth Cousens outlines what 250,000 voices reveal about prevention, place and the future role of councils.

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham