Title

FINANCE

Fair Funding Review 2.0: Transitional arrangements will be critical

Some councils may have reserves to support fair funding transition, but this is not sustainable long-term, says Tracy BIngham.

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With each passing year the case for funding reform has sharpened as structural pressures and funding gaps have become more acute. Until this year, the system seemingly evolved to divert funding away from the most deprived areas who receive the least against their assessed need.

The Fair Funding Review 2.0 lays out long-awaited changes. Total funding available won't increase and there are big changes planned around where it will go – towards more deprived areas and away from shire districts and some London boroughs. Whilst this blueprint is understood, the measurements remain unclear. There is helpful insight into indicative individual changes in need, but no full exemplification.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered?

Estimating next year's funding position therefore remains a modelling exercise. The sector is collaborating, and there's a growing sense of what the changes might mean for individual councils, but confidence remains informed rather than certain.

There's a sense of inevitability about the plans. We knew this change was coming and have scenario-modelled it, but its elusiveness over the years has made real preparation difficult.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered? The Government hasn't confirmed, but a 7% annual loss cap has been used illustratively. The relationship with council tax also needs attention – could additional tax-raising flexibilities be a right for those facing funding reductions, rather than an agreement upon request?

Some councils may have reserves to support transition, but this is not sustainable long-term. Moreover, reorganisation costs could undermine the benefits of reform in the short term unless they are acknowledged and supported.

We must also recognise that the broader and fundamental issue of council tax reform has not been addressed in the review. There is still much to work out.

 

Tracy Bingham is executive director – resources and transformation (s151 officer) at South Derbyshire DC

 

FINANCE

Over 80,000 children face year-long waits for community health appointments

By Emily Whitehouse | 23 October 2026

More than 80,000 children and young people in England have waited over a year from community health appointments, according to the Care Quality Commission's ...

FINANCE

Local government seeks SEND deficit clarity ahead of Budget

By Martin Ford | 22 October 2026

Local government has called for clarity on deficits arising from special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) services in next week’s Budget.

FINANCE

Why devolution needs locality

By Julia Smith | 22 October 2026

Julia Smith says Blaby DC sees every day the value of working closely with local people, and the test of devolution will be whether communities across Leices...

FINANCE

Pervasive centralism continues

By Ian Miller | 22 October 2026

A lack of progress with the MHCLG’s review of fees and charges, and a conflict between changes to community right-to-buy rules and housing targets raise conc...

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham

-->