Title

FINANCE

Fair Funding Review 2.0: Transitional arrangements will be critical

Some councils may have reserves to support fair funding transition, but this is not sustainable long-term, says Tracy BIngham.

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With each passing year the case for funding reform has sharpened as structural pressures and funding gaps have become more acute. Until this year, the system seemingly evolved to divert funding away from the most deprived areas who receive the least against their assessed need.

The Fair Funding Review 2.0 lays out long-awaited changes. Total funding available won't increase and there are big changes planned around where it will go – towards more deprived areas and away from shire districts and some London boroughs. Whilst this blueprint is understood, the measurements remain unclear. There is helpful insight into indicative individual changes in need, but no full exemplification.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered?

Estimating next year's funding position therefore remains a modelling exercise. The sector is collaborating, and there's a growing sense of what the changes might mean for individual councils, but confidence remains informed rather than certain.

There's a sense of inevitability about the plans. We knew this change was coming and have scenario-modelled it, but its elusiveness over the years has made real preparation difficult.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered? The Government hasn't confirmed, but a 7% annual loss cap has been used illustratively. The relationship with council tax also needs attention – could additional tax-raising flexibilities be a right for those facing funding reductions, rather than an agreement upon request?

Some councils may have reserves to support transition, but this is not sustainable long-term. Moreover, reorganisation costs could undermine the benefits of reform in the short term unless they are acknowledged and supported.

We must also recognise that the broader and fundamental issue of council tax reform has not been addressed in the review. There is still much to work out.

 

Tracy Bingham is executive director – resources and transformation (s151 officer) at South Derbyshire DC

 

FINANCE

Fiscal Devolution in England: Breaking Treasury Myths

By Jack Shaw | 01 June 2026

England’s highly centralised financial model has prompted calls to break up or restructure the Treasury, going back several decades. But, as Jack Shaw explai...

FINANCE

Calling out the double standards

By Matina Maroughka | 01 June 2026

Matina Marougka says her study of women in senior roles in local government, the NHS and the charitable sector highlights the persistence of gender biases, a...

FINANCE

Moving away from care hierarchies to better support children and young people

By Dheeraj Chibber | 29 May 2026

Children and young people need a care system that is flexible enough to serve their needs and best interests as individuals says Dheeraj Chibber.

FINANCE

Prevention, neighbourhoods and the long game

By Ansaf Azhar | 28 May 2026

New evidence from Oxfordshire suggests this is not the moment to step back on health inequalities, says Ansaf Azhar.

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham