Title

FINANCE

Fair Funding Review 2.0: Transitional arrangements will be critical

Some councils may have reserves to support fair funding transition, but this is not sustainable long-term, says Tracy BIngham.

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

(c) Singkham/Shutterstock.com

With each passing year the case for funding reform has sharpened as structural pressures and funding gaps have become more acute. Until this year, the system seemingly evolved to divert funding away from the most deprived areas who receive the least against their assessed need.

The Fair Funding Review 2.0 lays out long-awaited changes. Total funding available won't increase and there are big changes planned around where it will go – towards more deprived areas and away from shire districts and some London boroughs. Whilst this blueprint is understood, the measurements remain unclear. There is helpful insight into indicative individual changes in need, but no full exemplification.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered?

Estimating next year's funding position therefore remains a modelling exercise. The sector is collaborating, and there's a growing sense of what the changes might mean for individual councils, but confidence remains informed rather than certain.

There's a sense of inevitability about the plans. We knew this change was coming and have scenario-modelled it, but its elusiveness over the years has made real preparation difficult.

Transitional arrangements will be critical. The key question is at what level is protection triggered? The Government hasn't confirmed, but a 7% annual loss cap has been used illustratively. The relationship with council tax also needs attention – could additional tax-raising flexibilities be a right for those facing funding reductions, rather than an agreement upon request?

Some councils may have reserves to support transition, but this is not sustainable long-term. Moreover, reorganisation costs could undermine the benefits of reform in the short term unless they are acknowledged and supported.

We must also recognise that the broader and fundamental issue of council tax reform has not been addressed in the review. There is still much to work out.

 

Tracy Bingham is executive director – resources and transformation (s151 officer) at South Derbyshire DC

 

FINANCE

Keeping a grip on what matters

By Pam Parkes | 23 April 2026

As delegates gather in Birmingham today for the PPMA conference, outgoing president Pam Parkes urges leaders to ask the harder questions even when the immedi...

FINANCE

Rethinking the Better Care Fund

By Mark Palethorpe | 22 April 2026

Moving integrated care from rhetoric to reality calls for an urgent review of how resources like the Better Care Fund are structured, governed and deployed, ...

FINANCE

'Banging the table for children'

By Ann McGauran | 22 April 2026

The new president of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services’ passionate belief in the rights of children and young people shines through. Ann Mc...

FINANCE

Is income tax assignment a step change in English devolution?

By Mark Sandford | 22 April 2026

Kevin Muldoon-Smith and Mark Sandford say assigning a share of income tax locally could strengthen incentives for long-term, place-based strategy, but intern...

Tracy Bingham

Popular articles by Tracy Bingham