Title

REORGANISATION

War of words over Surrey CC reorganisation plan

Opposition Surrey CC members have argued a plan for two new unitary authorities in the county was based on ‘inconsistent, incomplete and flawed data’.

Surrey CC © Surrey CC

Surrey CC © Surrey CC

Opposition Surrey CC members have argued a plan for two new unitary authorities in the county was based on ‘inconsistent, incomplete and flawed data'.

Conservative-led Surrey CC has submitted a proposal for two unitary councils but the Lib Dems, Labour, Greens and residents' association and independents group insisted the ‘only answer' was a three unitary model backed by nine out of the county's 11 districts.

Surrey CC leader Tim Oliver said: ‘I'm afraid they've just got themselves confused. The recommended geography for a two unitary split of Surrey is based on evidence, with a huge number of factors taken into account. It is also important to note local support and feedback from partner agencies – including other councils – in the final proposal.'

The Conservative leader of Surrey borough Reigate & Banstead, Richard Biggs, has risked relations with his party colleague Cllr Oliver by proposing a new unitary with West Sussex's Crawley BC – home to Gatwick Airport.

Crawley and Reigate & Banstead's case is focused on bringing together the two authorities, but also mentions potential link ups with Tandridge, Mole Valley and Epsom & Ewell.

Surrey CC's opposition leaders claimed there were ‘strong concerns about the lack of political support' or public engagement for the Reigate & Banstead and Crawley plan, with Tandridge DC and Epsom & Ewell both strongly opposing being part of any unitary including Crawley.

Tandridge leader Catherine Sayer said her authority had ‘little in common with Crawley' and there would be ‘considerable drawbacks for our district joining any unitary with them'.

The county and districts have all asked the Government to write off the current estimated debt of £1.5bn but this remains a point of contention.

Cllr Oliver said talks had started with the Treasury, adding: ‘The Government will have to step in and they will have to write it off.'

A senior Surrey source said: ‘We're playing poker and we're not folding.

‘Relationships are challenging. All eyes are on Surrey. The Government needs this to work and there's a lot of pressure on the Government.'

Another senior Surrey source added: ‘The ball is back in the Government's court. Debt remains a massive issue. Woking BC's debt needs to be written off as no unitary will survive and be financially resilient any other way.'

 

REORGANISATION

Supporting council leadership

By Max Wide | 10 June 2026

A Leadership Centre programme is aimed at helping middle managers forming unitaries to build relationships, work collaboratively and give them a stake in cre...

REORGANISATION

Keeping reorganisation on track: Preparing East and West Surrey for vesting day

By Terence Herbert | 03 June 2026

Ahead of the launch of East Surrey and West Surrey councils in April 2027, local government reorganisation is moving into a new phase with the implementation...

REORGANISATION

Turning reorganisation into real transformation

By Jess Browne | 02 June 2026

The councils that get most from local government reorganisation will be the ones that focus on the kind of organisations they want to create, says Jess Brown...

REORGANISATION

Reorganisation deadline 'tight and frankly unreasonable'

By Martin Ford | 02 June 2026

A district council has branded the Government’s local government reorganisation deadline ‘tight and frankly unreasonable’.

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters