REORGANISATION

War of words over Surrey CC reorganisation plan

Opposition Surrey CC members have argued a plan for two new unitary authorities in the county was based on ‘inconsistent, incomplete and flawed data’.

Surrey CC © Surrey CC

Surrey CC © Surrey CC

Opposition Surrey CC members have argued a plan for two new unitary authorities in the county was based on ‘inconsistent, incomplete and flawed data'.

Conservative-led Surrey CC has submitted a proposal for two unitary councils but the Lib Dems, Labour, Greens and residents' association and independents group insisted the ‘only answer' was a three unitary model backed by nine out of the county's 11 districts.

Surrey CC leader Tim Oliver said: ‘I'm afraid they've just got themselves confused. The recommended geography for a two unitary split of Surrey is based on evidence, with a huge number of factors taken into account. It is also important to note local support and feedback from partner agencies – including other councils – in the final proposal.'

The Conservative leader of Surrey borough Reigate & Banstead, Richard Biggs, has risked relations with his party colleague Cllr Oliver by proposing a new unitary with West Sussex's Crawley BC – home to Gatwick Airport.

Crawley and Reigate & Banstead's case is focused on bringing together the two authorities, but also mentions potential link ups with Tandridge, Mole Valley and Epsom & Ewell.

Surrey CC's opposition leaders claimed there were ‘strong concerns about the lack of political support' or public engagement for the Reigate & Banstead and Crawley plan, with Tandridge DC and Epsom & Ewell both strongly opposing being part of any unitary including Crawley.

Tandridge leader Catherine Sayer said her authority had ‘little in common with Crawley' and there would be ‘considerable drawbacks for our district joining any unitary with them'.

The county and districts have all asked the Government to write off the current estimated debt of £1.5bn but this remains a point of contention.

Cllr Oliver said talks had started with the Treasury, adding: ‘The Government will have to step in and they will have to write it off.'

A senior Surrey source said: ‘We're playing poker and we're not folding.

‘Relationships are challenging. All eyes are on Surrey. The Government needs this to work and there's a lot of pressure on the Government.'

Another senior Surrey source added: ‘The ball is back in the Government's court. Debt remains a massive issue. Woking BC's debt needs to be written off as no unitary will survive and be financially resilient any other way.'

 

REORGANISATION

Can reorganisation deliver its promises?

By Jason Lowther | 12 June 2025

As the latest round of reorganisation gets under way, Jason Lowther looks at what international research has to say about whether larger councils actually le...

REORGANISATION

Let's design a future that champions local identity

By Cllr Sam Chapman-Allen | 12 June 2025

The danger remains that reorganisation will result in remote councils and simply consolidate administrative structures without reforming the services local a...

REORGANISATION

Lancashire moves closer to reorganisation agreement

By By Neil Merrick | 12 June 2025

Councils in Lancashire are edging closer to an agreement on reorganisation, but it is likely to be left to ministers to decide on a final proposal.

REORGANISATION

Shifting from cure to prevention in Cardiff

By Stephen Taylor | 11 June 2025

Total Place, relational public services and community engagement are at the core of a move to focus on worklessness and on priority groups and neighbourhoods...

Dan Peters

Popular articles by Dan Peters